• Welcome
    Sponsors
  • Director
    Members
    Advisory Board
    International Advisory Council
    Research Affiliates
    IPilogue Editors
    Alumni
  • IPilogue
    Events
    Publications
  • JD
    Graduate Program
    Clinical
    Prizes & Awards
  • The IPIGRAM Archive
    Events Archive
    IP in the News
    IP Poll of the Week
    IP Pick of the Week
    Gowlings IPilogue Prize
  • Legislation
    Journals
    Government
  • Contact Us
    Subscribe

Thinking Through IP Strategy

November 14, 2011 by Asad Ali Moten

Asad Ali Moten is a JD candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School. Here, he reports on a workshop he organized for clients and prospective clients of ventureLAB, while interning there as part of the inaugural offering of the Intellectual Property Law and Technology Intensive Program (IP Intensive) at Osgoode.

On November 9, 2011, with the assistance of IP Osgoode, Smart & Biggar, Miller Thomson, and generous Osgoode students, the ventureLAB team put on a showcase event at the Markham Convergence Centre entitled “Intellectual Property: Is It Worth Protecting?”  I had the distinct pleasure of speaking to a record turnout crowd of over 90 participants representing a variety of small businesses and start-ups.

For many of the clients I have interacted with while interning at ventureLAB, one of the challenges has been to think about intellectual property as part of a broader business strategy.  Entrepreneurs knew they had a product worth protecting, but did not know what kind of protection was warranted or how it would be obtained.  More pressingly, it was apparent that IP as a strategy intertwined with the business plan was a concept that needed to be emphasized.

The first half of the morning provided participants with a crash course in intellectual property, examining aspects of trade-marks, patents, and copyrights.  The objective of the presentation was to show participants how to compare the various intellectual property regimes and to understand how to think about them in relation to their own business.  Trade secrets and confidential information were also discussed as valuable aspects of intellectual property that could help protect growing businesses.

While that portion of the event was mostly theoretical, the Q&A with Alistair Simpson and Sally Hemming from Smart & Biggar provided participants with the opportunity to ask more pointed questions about the practical realities of IP protection.  Both Mr Simpson and Ms Hemming spoke candidly about their own experiences as IP lawyers, and the discussions they had with participants before and during the break showed that businesses really want to include IP as part of their overall strategy.  Questions revolving around provisional patents, enforcing copyrights abroad and online, and how to decide when to keep something a trade secret or pursue a patent were among the more popular concerns of participants.

Professor Giuseppina D’Agostino, Founder and Director of IP Osgoode, provided participants with a wealth of information regarding how IP Osgoode can be a resource for their intellectual property needs.  One aspect of her talk which generated a great deal of buzz was the OCE / IP Osgoode Innovation Clinic in partnership with the Ontario Centres for Excellence (OCE).  This clinic will assist start-ups and entrepreneurs to commercialise their intellectual property by working with law students, OCE, and lawyers from Torys.  Participants were also interested to hear about how they could house a law student as ‘in-house legal counsel’ for a semester through the Intellectual Property and Technology Law Intensive Program (IP Intensive), of which I am excited to be part of the inaugural class and which is responsible for my placement at ventureLAB.

The morning ended with a breakout session in which groups of participants worked together as a business team, each aided by an ‘in-house legal counsel’ in the form of a volunteer Osgoode law student.  The teams were given fictional inventions and were tasked with coming up with IP strategies to commercialise their invention.  The breakout groups spawned lively debate and discussion, as well as some fascinatingly creative business strategies for each invention.

A great turnout, and an invaluable opportunity to learn from peers – thank you to all who took part.

Posted in events, Feature Post

Leave a Reply

All replies and responses are moderated and will not appear on the site immediately. Please see our response policy.

« Osgoode Entertainment & Sports Law Association Launches Its Own Blog | Appropriately Approaching Appropriation: Osgoode Professors On Feminist Alternatives To Postcolonial Intellectual Property Issues »

Career Opportunities
Osgoode IP Club
Writing Competitions
IP Research Guide

Follow @IPilogue

RSS Follow Comments via RSS
  • Dezso Farkas on Law, Culture, Critique
  • Anand Misir on Implications and Meaning of a Perpetual Licence
  • Denise Brunsdon on The Living Daylights (…Scents, Tastes, and Sounds): Bill C-56 Forebodes Drastic Trade-mark Reform
  • Denise Brunsdon on Must Every Canadian Patent Application Include the Inventor’s Best Mode of Working the Invention?
  • Matt on Mario Bouchard: Copyright Quintet opus 1. no.1, by McLachlin et al
  • Danny Titolo on The ‘Myriad’ with the Golden ‘Gene’: Australia Upholds Breast Cancer Gene Patents
  • Tracy Ayodele on Exceptions which Circumvent Logic
  • Nancy Situ on Military Tactics and Rock Star Patent Lawyers; the Patent System under Stress
  • Laura on The Rise and Fall [and Rise Again?] of BlackBerry
  • Howard Knopf on How Music Can Help You, And You Can Help Music – An Interview With Graham Henderson
RSS Follow Posts via RSS
  • Taking ATRIP Down Memory Lane
  • Cracking Down on Green Mountain Trolls
  • Breach of Confidence: Your “Friends” Can’t Protect You
  • Winners of the Gowlings Best Blog in IP and Technology Law Prize!
  • Beyond Knowledge and Consciousness – The Development of Liability for Misuse of Trade Secrets in the UK
  • The Office of the Privacy Commissioner Calls for Changes to PIPEDA
  • IP Osgoode Welcomes Professor Victor Nabhan
  • Sitting This One Out: SCC Refuses to Clarify “Promise of a Patent” Doctrine
  • IP Osgoode: Call for IPilogue Editor Applications
  • Mamma Mia: Nintendo Flexes Copyright Against YouTube Video Game Reviewers
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • Advisory Board (10)
  • Announcements (33)
  • Blogs (26)
  • Book Review (5)
  • Broadcasting Regulatory Policy (8)
  • Cloud Services (11)
  • Commercialization (91)
  • Competition (20)
  • Competition Law (15)
  • Contracts (70)
  • copyright reform (159)
  • defamation (19)
  • Design (16)
  • Development (6)
  • European Union (58)
  • events (91)
  • Fashion Industry (23)
  • Feature Post (211)
  • Freedom of Speech (22)
  • Freedom of the Press (17)
  • Gaming (10)
  • General (155)
  • Human Rights (10)
  • Image (6)
  • Innovation (156)
  • Internet (276)
  • IP (1255)
    • Copyright (623)
      • CD Levy (10)
      • Digital Downloads (78)
      • Digital Libraries (7)
      • Digital Locks (34)
      • Fair Dealing (82)
        • Parody (2)
        • Satire (1)
      • Infringement (160)
      • Internet Sharing (96)
      • Literary Works (65)
      • Moral Rights (16)
      • Movies (53)
      • Music Industry (105)
      • Originality (34)
      • Ownership (108)
        • Licensees (39)
      • Secondary (ISP) Liability (19)
      • Subsidiary Rights (5)
    • IP Reform (40)
    • Patents (387)
      • Access to Medicines (21)
      • Cross Border Issues (50)
      • Electronic Processes (20)
      • Infringement (75)
      • Patent Practice (27)
      • Patent Trolls (21)
      • Patentability (111)
      • Pharmaceutical Drugs (77)
    • Trademarks (247)
      • Domain Names (44)
      • Famous Marks (20)
      • Official Marks (11)
      • Parallel Importation (4)
      • Personality Rights (12)
  • IP Course Topic (13)
  • IP Intensive (26)
  • IP Litigation Practice (17)
  • Jurisdiction (186)
    • Canada (84)
    • Indonesia (1)
    • Japan (2)
    • UK (44)
    • US (78)
  • Law & Music Course Topic (21)
  • Links (3)
  • MediaLaws (18)
  • Music Industry (86)
  • Open-Source (18)
  • Osgoode Alumnus (14)
  • Patents Course Topic (28)
  • Privacy (190)
    • Electronic Databases (42)
    • Human Rights Issues (31)
    • Identity Theft (14)
  • Regulatory Policy (67)
  • Reputation Management (5)
  • Smartphones (15)
  • Social Justice (4)
    • United Nations Development Programme (2)
  • Social Media (31)
  • Supreme Court of Canada (37)
  • Tech Transfer (31)
  • Technology (247)
  • Telecommunications (89)
  • Trade Secrets (10)
  • UK (21)
  • Uncategorized (104)
  • US-Canada Relations (6)
  • WIPO (19)
  • Log in

Home   |   Contact Us   |   Feedback  |   Privacy   

© 2008 Osgoode Hall Law School York University
4700 Keele Street Toronto, Canada M3J 1P3
T:416.736.5030   F:416.736.5736