Skip to content
IP Osgoode
  • ABOUT
  • OUR TEAM
    • DIRECTOR
    • MEMBERS
    • ADVISORY BOARD
    • SPONSORS
  • IPILOGUE
    • ABOUT THE IPILOGUE
    • BLOG
      • Announcements
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Copyright
      • Innovation
      • IP Innovation Clinic
      • IP Intensive
      • Patents
      • Privacy
      • Technology
      • Trademarks
    • IPILOGUE TEAM
    • GOWLING WLG PRIZE
    • IPIGRAM ARCHIVE
    • WRITE FOR US
  • IP INNOVATION CLINIC
    • ABOUT
    • CHATBOT
    • BECOME A CLIENT
    • CLINIC FELLOWS
    • THE IP LUNCH CLUB
    • FAQS
  • IP INTENSIVE
    • ABOUT
    • PLACEMENTS
  • RESEARCH
    • IP LAW & POLICY
    • INNOVATION
    • LAW REFORM
  • EVENTS
    • UPCOMING EVENTS
    • PAST EVENTS
  • CONTESTS & COMPETITIONS
    • 2021 Oxford International Intellectual Property Law Moot
    • WIPO Short Story Competition: Indigenous Ingenuity and Creativity
    • IP WRITING CHALLENGE
    Home
    >
    IP
    >
    Patents
    >
    Electronic Processes

    Category: Electronic Processes

    September 27, 2018in Electronic Processes, Innovation, IP, Patentability, Patents, Technology0by Editor
    2028

    Blockchain on Every Street Corner – Walmart and the Rise of Mainstream Blockchain Patents

    Walmart’s American patents and reported patent-related activities over the last few months show just how common blockchain-based technology is going to become in the immediate future. Walmart currently holds such patents…

    Read more
    December 6, 2016in Blogs, Electronic Processes, IP Intensive, Patent Trolls, Patents1by Editor
    972

    Patenting the Online Peer Review Process?

    Yes, it is apparently possible – Elsevier just did it. Elsevier is one of the largest science and medical publishers in the world. Prestigious journals, such as Cell and The…

    Read more
    October 7, 2015in Blogs, Electronic Processes, IP, Patentability, Patents0by Editor
    930

    Means for Invalidating a Patent: Lessons from the Eon Corp v. AT&T Decision

    This article is cross-posted with permission from Bereskin & Parr. It is very important to provide adequate disclosure when using “means-plus-function” claims in a U.S. patent, particularly in the field…

    Read more
    July 15, 2014in Competition, Competition Law, Electronic Processes, Innovation, IP, IP Reform, Patentability, Patents, US0by Editor
    1173

    Alice Corp., Software Patents, and Lighting the Rabbit Hole of Abstract Ideas

    It’s often hard to recognize the evolving nature of legal regimes amidst the fast-paced and so-called revolutionary social and technological changes facilitated by digital and networked technologies. Laws, norms, and…

    Read more
    September 11, 2013in Canada, Competition, Electronic Processes, Innovation, Patent Practice, Patentability, Patents, Pharmaceutical Drugs, Smartphones, Technology, Telecommunications0by Editor
    970

    What a Potential Blackberry Sale Says About Canadian Innovation

    In a recent Globe and Mail op-ed, columnist Konrad Yakabuski argues that the likely sale and potential breakup of Blackberry would be a major setback to Canada’s innovation agenda. (more…)

    Read more
    September 4, 2013in Electronic Processes, Infringement, Patents, Smartphones, Technology, US0by Editor
    1131

    Apple's Appealing Patent Result

    In the latest episode of the Apple patent saga, the United States Court of Appeals has altered a decision by the International Trade Commission (ITC) discussing two crucial features of…

    Read more

    Posts navigation

    1 2 … 5
    Search
      Categories
      IP Osgoode
      © Osgoode Hall Law School, York University
      • Privacy & Legal
      Osgoode Hall Law School, York University
      Ignat Kaneff Building
      4700 Keele Street
      Toronto, Ontario  M3J 1P3
      Canada

      T:416.736.5030   F:416.736.5736