• Welcome
    Sponsors
  • Director
    Members
    Advisory Board
    International Advisory Council
    Research Affiliates
    IPilogue Editors
    Alumni
  • IPilogue
    Events
    Publications
  • JD
    Graduate Program
    Clinical
    Prizes & Awards
  • The IPIGRAM Archive
    Events Archive
    IP in the News
    IP Poll of the Week
    IP Pick of the Week
    Gowlings IPilogue Prize
  • Legislation
    Journals
    Government
  • Contact Us
    Subscribe

The IPIGRAM (November 10, 2008)

IP Osgoode boasted a packed schedule of events last week.  The events were all well attended and provoked questions and discussion from those in attendance.

On November 4, Lord Justice Jacob of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales gave a talk entitled “The Scope of a Patent: Claim Construction and Equivalents”.  Lord Justice Jacob covered a number of perspectives on claim construction in patents from a unique comparative perspective and answered numerous questions from a captivated audience.

On November 7, IP Osgoode held a roundtable at Gowlings featuring women leading across various fields in intellectual property for a discussion entitled “Women and IP: Is everything rosy in here or is the glass ceiling tinted pink?”  The panelists included:

Susan Abramovitch (Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP)
Professor Ann Bartow (University of South Carolina)
Darlene H. Carreau (Trade-marks Opposition Board)
May Cheng (Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP)
Professor Carys Craig (Osgoode Hall Law School)
Virginia H.L. Jones (Canadian Motion Picture Distributors Association)
Sangeetha Punniyamoorthy (Dimock Stratton LLP)
Pascale Chapdelaine (PhD candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School)

The Honourable Justice Karen Weiler from the Ontario Court of Appeal was also able to join the discussion and provide her perspective.  All the panelists shared diverse experiences and provided valuable insight for all the guests. 

To conclude the day on November 7, Professor Ann Bartow, University of South Carolina, delivered a special lecture “The Intersection of Copyright and Pornography”, where she examined the possible role that copyright law might play in promoting the safety and dignity of pornographic performers in the production of pornography.    

Browse and Enjoy!

Giuseppina D’Agostino

 

 Lord Justice Jacob with Osgoode students

Above: Lord Justice Jacob with Osgoode students (from left, Jonathan Giraldi, Lord Justice Robin Jacob, Shuo Li, Bal Krishna, and Ori Rubin)

 

Featured Blog Post

You are standing on my property… I think
November 6, 2008 by Jonathan Giraldi (IPilogue Editor)

In a lecture delivered on November 4 to a class of Osgoode IP students, Lord Justice Jacob of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales provided an expert viewpoint of the ongoing debate revolving around the scope of patent monopolies.  Read more

 

IPilogue – Recent Posts

Supreme Court of Canada Protects Diamonds in the Rough
November 11, 2008 by Jonathan Giraldi (IPilogue Editor)

In a unanimous decision released last Thursday (Apotex Inc. v. Sanofi‑Synthelabo Canada Inc., 2008 SCC 61), the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that selection patents are, in principle, valid under the Canadian Patent Act.  Read more

‘Women and IP: is everything rosy in here or is the glass ceiling tinted pink?’ – IP Osgoode takes the lead in addressing gender issues in the IP field
November 10, 2008 by Anna Shahid (IPilogue Editor)

On Friday, November 7, IP Osgoode held a unique event: a roundtable of numerous female leaders in the IP field discussed and reflected on the opportunities and challenges that women face in this area of the law.  Read more

Bilski Decision Gives Test for Scope of Patentable Subject Matter for U.S. Patents
November 10, 2008 by Ryan Prescott (IPilogue Editor)

The much anticipated decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Re Bilski is the latest development in the ongoing debate over the scope of patentable subject matter in the United States.  Read more

Typosquatting: a civil conspiracy?
November 9, 2008 by Reshika Dhir (IPilogue Editor)

Google has become a well known name in the world of IP lawsuits. Just before Google got a chance to settle the huge lawsuit over ‘book scanning‘, it was faced with yet another one.  Read more

Free Speech Online Buoyed, but Concerns Remain
November 5, 2008 by Julian Ho (IPilogue Editor)

Last Monday, the British Columbia Supreme Court released an important decision regarding online defamation in Crookes v. Wikimedia Foundation Inc., 2008 BCSC 1424.  Read more

A New Chapter for the Google Books Library Project
November 4, 2008 by Adrienne Ng (IPilogue Editor)

The Google Books Library Project is a hugely ambitious initiative to catalogue the millions of books in the collections of several major libraries and include them into Google Book Search.  Read more

 

IP in the News

Court Rules Game Manufacturers Have Free Speech Rights
A strip club’s claims that its trademark rights are infringed by the video game “Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas” have been dismissed.

Downloading guru seeks ruling on legality
The Canadian owner of a popular website (IsoHunt.com) is seeking a ruling from the Supreme Court of British Columbia on whether or not his site violates the Copyright Act.

Supreme Court strengthens drug patent protection
In a unanimous decision delivered by Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein, the Supreme Court of Canada has held that “selection patents” are acceptable in principle and are not necessarily invalid.

Osgoode Hall offers up new IP resource to students
Canadian Lawyer Magazine runs an article about the new IP Osgoode program

Obama Victory Draws Quick Reactions From IP, Tech Communities
Many are curious to see how Barack Obama’s administration will deal with IP-related policy.  Shamnad Basheer (an IP Osgoode research affiliate) is quoted in the story.

New video ad deal for MySpace, MTV Networks
MySpace will overlay advertisements on MTV content that is uploaded by users and share revenue with content copyright holders. 

Google suddenly big in book business
Canadian publishers are unsure about the effects of the Google Book Search dispute settlement.

 

IP Pick of the Week

The Intellectual Property Colloquium (hosted by Professor Doug Lichtman, UCLA Law School) provides a series of online audio podcasts devoted to IP topics.

 

IP Poll of the Week

In last week’s poll, 75% of voters disagreed in supporting a law that requires Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to terminate internet service to those who repeatedly infringe copyright law.

This week’s question: Should business method patents be abolished, as recently suggested by Judge Mayer of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in his dissenting opinion in the Bilski case?

Visit our website to vote on our IP Poll of the Week.


Career Opportunities
Osgoode IP Club
Writing Competitions
IP Research Guide

Follow @IPilogue

RSS Follow Comments via RSS
  • Denise Brunsdon on The Living Daylights (…Scents, Tastes, and Sounds): Bill C-56 Forebodes Drastic Trade-mark Reform
  • Denise Brunsdon on Must Every Canadian Patent Application Include the Inventor’s Best Mode of Working the Invention?
  • Matt on Mario Bouchard: Copyright Quintet opus 1. no.1, by McLachlin et al
  • Danny Titolo on The ‘Myriad’ with the Golden ‘Gene’: Australia Upholds Breast Cancer Gene Patents
  • Tracy Ayodele on Exceptions which Circumvent Logic
  • Nancy Situ on Military Tactics and Rock Star Patent Lawyers; the Patent System under Stress
  • Laura on The Rise and Fall [and Rise Again?] of BlackBerry
  • Howard Knopf on How Music Can Help You, And You Can Help Music – An Interview With Graham Henderson
  • Paul Atkinson on Bill C-56 Remedies: Rights Holders Can All Feel a Little Safer
  • Bart Cormier on The Living Daylights (…Scents, Tastes, and Sounds): Bill C-56 Forebodes Drastic Trade-mark Reform
RSS Follow Posts via RSS
  • EU Moving Toward New Trade-Mark Regime
  • A Cautionary Kudos: Canada Moves Up on USTR IP Watch List
  • New Step for the Modernization of Copyright Law in the US – Progress or Regress?
  • Reminder: Canada’s IP Writing Challenge 2013
  • Property in Brands
  • Strike Three, Viacom
  • New Book – The Copyright Pentalogy: How the Supreme Court of Canada Shook the Foundations of Canadian Copyright Law
  • The Curious Case of Fake Beijing Olympics Merchandise
  • About the Boundaries of Fairness in Fair Use
  • Who Inherits Your Likes?
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • Advisory Board (9)
  • Announcements (31)
  • Blogs (24)
  • Book Review (5)
  • Broadcasting Regulatory Policy (8)
  • Cloud Services (11)
  • Commercialization (90)
  • Competition (19)
  • Competition Law (14)
  • Contracts (69)
  • copyright reform (159)
  • defamation (19)
  • Design (16)
  • Development (6)
  • European Union (56)
  • events (88)
  • Fashion Industry (22)
  • Feature Post (206)
  • Freedom of Speech (22)
  • Freedom of the Press (17)
  • Gaming (9)
  • General (151)
  • Human Rights (10)
  • Image (6)
  • Innovation (156)
  • Internet (274)
  • IP (1244)
    • Copyright (618)
      • CD Levy (10)
      • Digital Downloads (78)
      • Digital Libraries (7)
      • Digital Locks (34)
      • Fair Dealing (79)
        • Parody (2)
        • Satire (1)
      • Infringement (157)
      • Internet Sharing (96)
      • Literary Works (65)
      • Moral Rights (15)
      • Movies (53)
      • Music Industry (104)
      • Originality (33)
      • Ownership (107)
        • Licensees (39)
      • Secondary (ISP) Liability (18)
      • Subsidiary Rights (5)
    • IP Reform (38)
    • Patents (382)
      • Access to Medicines (21)
      • Cross Border Issues (50)
      • Electronic Processes (20)
      • Infringement (72)
      • Patent Practice (27)
      • Patent Trolls (21)
      • Patentability (109)
      • Pharmaceutical Drugs (76)
    • Trademarks (245)
      • Domain Names (44)
      • Famous Marks (20)
      • Official Marks (11)
      • Parallel Importation (4)
      • Personality Rights (12)
  • IP Course Topic (13)
  • IP Intensive (26)
  • IP Litigation Practice (17)
  • Jurisdiction (178)
    • Canada (81)
    • Indonesia (1)
    • Japan (2)
    • UK (41)
    • US (75)
  • Law & Music Course Topic (21)
  • Links (3)
  • MediaLaws (17)
  • Music Industry (85)
  • Open-Source (18)
  • Osgoode Alumnus (14)
  • Patents Course Topic (28)
  • Privacy (188)
    • Electronic Databases (42)
    • Human Rights Issues (31)
    • Identity Theft (14)
  • Regulatory Policy (65)
  • Reputation Management (4)
  • Smartphones (14)
  • Social Justice (4)
    • United Nations Development Programme (2)
  • Social Media (30)
  • Supreme Court of Canada (35)
  • Tech Transfer (31)
  • Technology (245)
  • Telecommunications (89)
  • Trade Secrets (9)
  • UK (19)
  • Uncategorized (102)
  • US-Canada Relations (5)
  • WIPO (18)
  • Log in

Home   |   Contact Us   |   Feedback  |   Privacy   

© 2008 Osgoode Hall Law School York University
4700 Keele Street Toronto, Canada M3J 1P3
T:416.736.5030   F:416.736.5736