<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IP Osgoode</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iposgoode.ca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iposgoode.ca</link>
	<description>Intellectual Property Law &#38; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:20:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Patentability of Business Methods in Canada: The Case of Amazon.com&#8217;s 1-Click technology</title>
		<link>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/the-patentability-of-business-methods-in-canada-the-case-of-amazon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/the-patentability-of-business-methods-in-canada-the-case-of-amazon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catherine Du Pont-Thibodeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patentability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iposgoode.ca/?p=7365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Catherine Du Pont-Thibodeau is a J.D. candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School and is taking the Patent Law course.
A topic recently caught my attention while surfing the Internet in search of a subject for this blog: the patentability of business methods in Canada and more particularly Amazon.com’s 1-Click technology. Having very little knowledge of patent [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/the-patentability-of-business-methods-in-canada-the-case-of-amazon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IP and its crucial role in start-ups</title>
		<link>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/ip-and-its-crucial-role-in-start-ups/</link>
		<comments>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/ip-and-its-crucial-role-in-start-ups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Virgil Cojocaru (IPilogue Editor)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercialization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patentability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iposgoode.ca/?p=7341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Virgil Cojocaru is a JD candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School.
These days governments are funding private sector enterprises. The public purse is increasingly used to aid businesses. However, many questions remain about the effectiveness of such a strategy. Josh Lerner, in his book, Boulevard of Broken Dreams: Why Public Efforts to Boost Entrepreneurship and Venture [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/ip-and-its-crucial-role-in-start-ups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who quizzes WHO’s role in solving the Influenza pandemic crisis: An Insight</title>
		<link>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/who-quizzes-whos-role-in-solving-the-influenza-pandemic-crisis-an-insight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/who-quizzes-whos-role-in-solving-the-influenza-pandemic-crisis-an-insight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nirav Bhatt (IPilogue Editor)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iposgoode.ca/?p=7299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nirav Bhatt is an LLM candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School.
The World Health Organization (WHO), last week witnessed tumultuous questions from various nations at the meeting of Executive Board Members of WHO on the outcomes of an Expert Working Group on Research and Development Financing (EWG) which raised concerns about methods of work employed by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/who-quizzes-whos-role-in-solving-the-influenza-pandemic-crisis-an-insight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Team Conan Leaving Jokes Behind</title>
		<link>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/team-conan-leaving-jokes-behind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/team-conan-leaving-jokes-behind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Freen (IPilogue Editor)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ownership]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iposgoode.ca/?p=7329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stu Freen is a JD candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School.
As details of Conan O’Brien’s severance deal with NBC leak out, it seems that at least one thing won’t be travelling with Conan to wherever he ends up: His signature characters and comedy bits. NBC has reportedly staked out the IP rights in classic Late [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/team-conan-leaving-jokes-behind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maize as Cultural Heritage</title>
		<link>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/maize-as-cultural-heritage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/maize-as-cultural-heritage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Waldkirch (IPilogue Editor)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iposgoode.ca/?p=7312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Peter Waldkirch is a second year LL.B. student at the University of Ottawa.
SciDev.net, a website providing “news, views and information about science, technology and the developing world” recently covered a move by Peru&#8217;s National Institute of Culture to declare the techniques for farming a variety of giant white maize, paraqay sara in the Quechua language, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/maize-as-cultural-heritage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Case of Apotex Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd.</title>
		<link>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/the-case-of-apotex-wellcome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/the-case-of-apotex-wellcome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ori Bergman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iposgoode.ca/?p=7319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ori Bergman is a J.D. candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School and is taking the Patent Law course.
The Utility requirement for granting a patent obligates the inventor to disclose an invention that works as predicted. Whether it works or not is seen as a question of fact. In submitting a claim, it is known that the specifications [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/the-case-of-apotex-wellcome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google, Verizon: Adversaries in Net Neutrality debate join forces for future of Internet Openness</title>
		<link>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/google-verizon-adversaries-in-net-neutrality-debate-join-forces-for-future-of-internet-openness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/google-verizon-adversaries-in-net-neutrality-debate-join-forces-for-future-of-internet-openness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Fan (IPilogue Editor)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iposgoode.ca/?p=7294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nathan Fan is a JD candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School.
The debate on network neutrality between network providers and content providers saw a moment of consolidation when the internet’s big name adversaries, Google and Verizon, submitted a joint submission regarding their views of an “Open Internet” to the Federal Communications Commission on 14 January 2010. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/google-verizon-adversaries-in-net-neutrality-debate-join-forces-for-future-of-internet-openness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lundbeck: The Duty of Good Faith Patent Prosecution</title>
		<link>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/lundbeck-the-duty-of-good-faith-patent-prosecution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/lundbeck-the-duty-of-good-faith-patent-prosecution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ankur Bhatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iposgoode.ca/?p=7278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ankur Bhatt is a J.D. candidate (2011) at Osgoode Hall and is taking the Patent Law course.
On November 23 of last year, the Federal Court of Canada released its decision in the case of Lundbeck v. ratiopharm, 2009 FC 1102 (“Lundbeck”), wherein a drug patent was considered to be invalid on the basis, inter alia, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/lundbeck-the-duty-of-good-faith-patent-prosecution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recapping the IP Career Panel &#8211; Wednesday January 27</title>
		<link>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/recapping-the-ip-career-panel-wednesday-january-27/</link>
		<comments>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/recapping-the-ip-career-panel-wednesday-january-27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Chau (IPilogue Editor)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osgoode Alumnus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iposgoode.ca/?p=7251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brian Chau is a JD Candidate at Osgoode Hall.
Special thanks to the panelists for contributing their perspectives and insight to the Osgoode community, and to Amanda Carpenter who has assisted me in writing this synopsis.
THE EVENT
On Wednesday January 27 2010, the IP club at Osgoode Hall Law School held a career panel with several distinguished [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/recapping-the-ip-career-panel-wednesday-january-27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clash of the Smartphone Titans &#8211; Nokia vs. Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/clash-of-the-smartphone-titans-nokia-vs-apple/</link>
		<comments>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/clash-of-the-smartphone-titans-nokia-vs-apple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Branch (IPilogue Editor)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iposgoode.ca/?p=7190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amanda Branch is a J.D. Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School, and is taking the Patent Law course.
Clashes between large companies are hardly uncommon, particularly when the salient issue concerns valuable intellectual property. Recently, Nokia has filed a lawsuit in the US against Apple claiming 10 alleged patent infringements involving wireless data, speed coding, security and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iposgoode.ca/2010/02/clash-of-the-smartphone-titans-nokia-vs-apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
