August 5, 2012 by Trevor Cook
As has already been widely reported, on Friday 29 June 2012 the European Council agreed on what has been presented as the final step on the long road to the Unitary EU Patent and a Unified European Patent Court.
Friday, May 24th, 2013
IPilogue Authors
|
Agreement, of a Sort, Reached on The Unified Patent Court
August 5, 2012 by Trevor Cook |
Career Opportunities
Osgoode IP Club
Writing Competitions
IP Research Guide
Follow Comments via RSS
- Denise Brunsdon on The Living Daylights (…Scents, Tastes, and Sounds): Bill C-56 Forebodes Drastic Trade-mark Reform
- Denise Brunsdon on Must Every Canadian Patent Application Include the Inventor’s Best Mode of Working the Invention?
- Matt on Mario Bouchard: Copyright Quintet opus 1. no.1, by McLachlin et al
- Danny Titolo on The ‘Myriad’ with the Golden ‘Gene’: Australia Upholds Breast Cancer Gene Patents
- Tracy Ayodele on Exceptions which Circumvent Logic
- Nancy Situ on Military Tactics and Rock Star Patent Lawyers; the Patent System under Stress
- Laura on The Rise and Fall [and Rise Again?] of BlackBerry
- Howard Knopf on How Music Can Help You, And You Can Help Music – An Interview With Graham Henderson
- Paul Atkinson on Bill C-56 Remedies: Rights Holders Can All Feel a Little Safer
- Bart Cormier on The Living Daylights (…Scents, Tastes, and Sounds): Bill C-56 Forebodes Drastic Trade-mark Reform
Follow Posts via RSS
- Law, Culture, Critique
- EU Moving Toward New Trade-Mark Regime
- A Cautionary Kudos: Canada Moves Up on USTR IP Watch List
- New Step for the Modernization of Copyright Law in the US – Progress or Regress?
- Reminder: Canada’s IP Writing Challenge 2013
- Property in Brands
- Strike Three, Viacom
- New Book – The Copyright Pentalogy: How the Supreme Court of Canada Shook the Foundations of Canadian Copyright Law
- The Curious Case of Fake Beijing Olympics Merchandise
- About the Boundaries of Fairness in Fair Use
- Advisory Board (9)
- Announcements (31)
- Blogs (24)
- Book Review (5)
- Broadcasting Regulatory Policy (8)
- Cloud Services (11)
- Commercialization (90)
- Competition (19)
- Competition Law (14)
- Contracts (69)
- copyright reform (159)
- defamation (19)
- Design (16)
- Development (6)
- European Union (56)
- events (89)
- Fashion Industry (23)
- Feature Post (207)
- Freedom of Speech (22)
- Freedom of the Press (17)
- Gaming (9)
- General (151)
- Human Rights (10)
- Image (6)
- Innovation (156)
- Internet (274)
- IP (1245)
- Copyright (619)
- CD Levy (10)
- Digital Downloads (78)
- Digital Libraries (7)
- Digital Locks (34)
- Fair Dealing (80)
- Infringement (158)
- Internet Sharing (96)
- Literary Works (65)
- Moral Rights (16)
- Movies (53)
- Music Industry (105)
- Originality (34)
- Ownership (107)
- Licensees (39)
- Secondary (ISP) Liability (18)
- Subsidiary Rights (5)
- IP Reform (38)
- Patents (382)
- Access to Medicines (21)
- Cross Border Issues (50)
- Electronic Processes (20)
- Infringement (72)
- Patent Practice (27)
- Patent Trolls (21)
- Patentability (109)
- Pharmaceutical Drugs (76)
- Trademarks (245)
- Domain Names (44)
- Famous Marks (20)
- Official Marks (11)
- Parallel Importation (4)
- Personality Rights (12)
- Copyright (619)
- IP Course Topic (13)
- IP Intensive (26)
- IP Litigation Practice (17)
- Jurisdiction (179)
- Law & Music Course Topic (21)
- Links (3)
- MediaLaws (17)
- Music Industry (86)
- Open-Source (18)
- Osgoode Alumnus (14)
- Patents Course Topic (28)
- Privacy (188)
- Electronic Databases (42)
- Human Rights Issues (31)
- Identity Theft (14)
- Regulatory Policy (65)
- Reputation Management (4)
- Smartphones (14)
- Social Justice (4)
- Social Media (30)
- Supreme Court of Canada (35)
- Tech Transfer (31)
- Technology (245)
- Telecommunications (89)
- Trade Secrets (9)
- UK (19)
- Uncategorized (102)
- US-Canada Relations (5)
- WIPO (18)