• Welcome
    Sponsors
  • Director
    Members
    Advisory Board
    International Advisory Council
    Research Affiliates
    IPilogue Editors
    Alumni
  • IPilogue
    Events
    Publications
  • JD
    Graduate Program
    Clinical
    Prizes & Awards
  • The IPIGRAM Archive
    Events Archive
    IP in the News
    IP Poll of the Week
    IP Pick of the Week
    Gowlings IPilogue Prize
  • Legislation
    Journals
    Government
  • Contact Us
    Subscribe

You Better Watch Out…For These Five Supreme Court Of Canada Cases

December 5, 2011 by Giuseppina D'Agostino

Giuseppina D’Agostino is the Founder and Director of IP Osgoode, the Founder and Director of the new IP Intensive Program, and an Associate Professor at Osgoode Hall Law School.

This December copyright is coming to town!  Five historic hearings at the Supreme Court of Canada and a brand new copyright bill in Parliament have the potential to dramatically change Canadian copyright law.

The Supreme Court of Canada will be streaming a live webcast of the proceedings on December 6-7, 2011, in the following five cases:

1.  Entertainment Software Association, et al. v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada (SCC Docket No. 33921) – Appeal of 2010 FCA 221 (A-521-07), in which the Federal Court of Appeal upheld the Copyright Board’s decision that a download of a video game that includes music is a communication of music to the public by telecommunication subject to royalties under the tariff;

2.  Province of Alberta as represented by the Minister of Education, et al. v. Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency, operating as “Access Copyright” (SCC Docket No. 33888) – Appeal of 2010 FCA 198 (A-302-09), in which the Federal Court of Appeal upheld the Copyright Board’s certification of a tariff for the reproduction of materials for use in primary and secondary level educational institutions;

3.  Re:Sound v. Motion Picture Theatre Associations of Canada, et al. (SCC Docket No. 34210) – Appeal of 2011 FCA 70 (A-433-09), in which the Federal Court of Appeal upheld the Copyright Board’s refusal to certify a tariff for music played in movies and on television;

4.  Rogers Communications Inc., et al. v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada (SCC Docket No. 33922) – Appeal of 2010 FCA 220 (A-519-07 & A-520-07), in which the Federal Court of Appeal upheld the Copyright Board’s decision that streaming music to computers or mobile devices is a communication to the public by telecommunication subject to the tariff; and

5.  Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, et al. v. Bell Canada, et al. (SCC Docket No. 33800) – Appeal of 2010 FCA 123 (A-514-07), in which the Federal Court of Appeal upheld the Copyright Board’s decision that online, streamed previews of musical works are communications to the public by telecommunication subject to the tariff.

Best of luck to the parties and to their counsel, including IP Osgoode Advisory Board members, Glen Bloom, Casey Chisick and Barry Sookman, in their representations before the Honourable Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein, also an IP Osgoode Advisory Board member, and his colleagues on the bench.

Posted in Cloud Services, Copyright, copyright reform, Digital Downloads, events, Fair Dealing, Feature Post, Gaming, Internet, Literary Works, Movies, Music Industry, Secondary (ISP) Liability, Smartphones, Supreme Court of Canada, Telecommunications

Leave a Reply

All replies and responses are moderated and will not appear on the site immediately. Please see our response policy.

« Patent Valuation Part 2: Combining Innovation Index and Product-Patent Clusters | Happy Holidays From IP Osgoode »

Career Opportunities
Osgoode IP Club
Writing Competitions
IP Research Guide

Follow @IPilogue

RSS Follow Comments via RSS
  • Denise Brunsdon on The Living Daylights (…Scents, Tastes, and Sounds): Bill C-56 Forebodes Drastic Trade-mark Reform
  • Denise Brunsdon on Must Every Canadian Patent Application Include the Inventor’s Best Mode of Working the Invention?
  • Matt on Mario Bouchard: Copyright Quintet opus 1. no.1, by McLachlin et al
  • Danny Titolo on The ‘Myriad’ with the Golden ‘Gene’: Australia Upholds Breast Cancer Gene Patents
  • Tracy Ayodele on Exceptions which Circumvent Logic
  • Nancy Situ on Military Tactics and Rock Star Patent Lawyers; the Patent System under Stress
  • Laura on The Rise and Fall [and Rise Again?] of BlackBerry
  • Howard Knopf on How Music Can Help You, And You Can Help Music – An Interview With Graham Henderson
  • Paul Atkinson on Bill C-56 Remedies: Rights Holders Can All Feel a Little Safer
  • Bart Cormier on The Living Daylights (…Scents, Tastes, and Sounds): Bill C-56 Forebodes Drastic Trade-mark Reform
RSS Follow Posts via RSS
  • New Step for the Modernization of Copyright Law in the US – Progress or Regress?
  • Reminder: Canada’s IP Writing Challenge 2013
  • Property in Brands
  • Strike Three, Viacom
  • New Book – The Copyright Pentalogy: How the Supreme Court of Canada Shook the Foundations of Canadian Copyright Law
  • The Curious Case of Fake Beijing Olympics Merchandise
  • About the Boundaries of Fairness in Fair Use
  • Who Inherits Your Likes?
  • Game of Thones – Piracy is Coming
  • AEREO, Cable, What’s The Difference?
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • Advisory Board (9)
  • Announcements (31)
  • Blogs (24)
  • Book Review (5)
  • Broadcasting Regulatory Policy (8)
  • Cloud Services (11)
  • Commercialization (90)
  • Competition (19)
  • Competition Law (14)
  • Contracts (69)
  • copyright reform (158)
  • defamation (19)
  • Design (15)
  • Development (6)
  • European Union (54)
  • events (88)
  • Fashion Industry (22)
  • Feature Post (206)
  • Freedom of Speech (22)
  • Freedom of the Press (17)
  • Gaming (9)
  • General (151)
  • Human Rights (10)
  • Image (6)
  • Innovation (156)
  • Internet (274)
  • IP (1242)
    • Copyright (617)
      • CD Levy (10)
      • Digital Downloads (78)
      • Digital Libraries (7)
      • Digital Locks (34)
      • Fair Dealing (79)
        • Parody (2)
        • Satire (1)
      • Infringement (157)
      • Internet Sharing (96)
      • Literary Works (65)
      • Moral Rights (15)
      • Movies (53)
      • Music Industry (104)
      • Originality (33)
      • Ownership (107)
        • Licensees (39)
      • Secondary (ISP) Liability (18)
      • Subsidiary Rights (5)
    • IP Reform (37)
    • Patents (381)
      • Access to Medicines (21)
      • Cross Border Issues (50)
      • Electronic Processes (20)
      • Infringement (72)
      • Patent Practice (27)
      • Patent Trolls (21)
      • Patentability (109)
      • Pharmaceutical Drugs (75)
    • Trademarks (243)
      • Domain Names (44)
      • Famous Marks (20)
      • Official Marks (11)
      • Parallel Importation (4)
      • Personality Rights (12)
  • IP Course Topic (13)
  • IP Intensive (26)
  • IP Litigation Practice (17)
  • Jurisdiction (176)
    • Canada (80)
    • Indonesia (1)
    • Japan (2)
    • UK (41)
    • US (74)
  • Law & Music Course Topic (21)
  • Links (3)
  • MediaLaws (17)
  • Music Industry (85)
  • Open-Source (18)
  • Osgoode Alumnus (14)
  • Patents Course Topic (28)
  • Privacy (188)
    • Electronic Databases (42)
    • Human Rights Issues (31)
    • Identity Theft (14)
  • Regulatory Policy (64)
  • Reputation Management (4)
  • Smartphones (14)
  • Social Justice (4)
    • United Nations Development Programme (2)
  • Social Media (30)
  • Supreme Court of Canada (34)
  • Tech Transfer (31)
  • Technology (245)
  • Telecommunications (89)
  • Trade Secrets (9)
  • UK (19)
  • Uncategorized (102)
  • US-Canada Relations (4)
  • WIPO (16)
  • Log in

Home   |   Contact Us   |   Feedback  |   Privacy   

© 2008 Osgoode Hall Law School York University
4700 Keele Street Toronto, Canada M3J 1P3
T:416.736.5030   F:416.736.5736