• Welcome
    Sponsors
  • Director
    Members
    Advisory Board
    International Advisory Council
    Research Affiliates
    IPilogue Editors
    Alumni
  • IPilogue
    Events
    Publications
  • JD
    Graduate Program
    Clinical
    Prizes & Awards
  • The IPIGRAM Archive
    Events Archive
    IP in the News
    IP Poll of the Week
    IP Pick of the Week
    Gowlings IPilogue Prize
  • Legislation
    Journals
    Government
  • Contact Us
    Subscribe

New Blog, law.arts.culture, Debuted by Osgoode Professor, Kate Sutherland

February 23, 2011 by Pauline Wong

Pauline Wong is the Assistant Director of IP Osgoode.

A new member to the blogosphere, law.arts.culture, has been launched by Professor Kate Sutherland, a writer and Associate Professor at Osgoode Hall Law School. 

The blog is self-described as “devoted to exploration of the intersection of law and the arts—literature, music, theatre, film, visual art and more.” Professor Sutherland has begun the blog as a solo blogger, but future contributors will include guest bloggers and Osgoode Hall Law School professors, students and alumni.

Her second post is a fantastic sample from the blog.  With wonderful insight and a light sense of humour, Professor Sutherland blogged about Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol and his 1844 copyright infringement trial against Richard Egan Lee and John Haddock complaining about their knock-off entitled, A Christmas Ghost Story.

Professor Sutherland’s research unearthed fascinating details and dialogue that only Hollywood – or writers from the 19th century – could dream up.  Lee and Haddock’s defence to the injunction was that that, as Professor Sutherland puts it, “A Christmas Ghost Story was not simply a copy of A Christmas Carol, but a considerable improvement upon it, and hence an original work”!  On the return of the interim injunction motion, Dickens prevailed and in celebration exclaimed, “The pirates are beaten flat. They are bruised, bloody, battered, smashed, squelched, and utterly undone.”  However, in the end, Lee and Haddock declared bankruptcy, thereby never paying legal costs owed to Dickens.

The next time he was confronted with piracy, Dickens assessed the situation and, with the benefit of his experience from the Christmas Carol case, surrendered, “[I]t is better to suffer a great wrong than to have recourse to the much greater wrong of the law.”

Already, Professor Sutherland’s blog has been well-received.  Fellow writer and blogger, Helen Gunnarsson (see her blog, Law and Conversation), commented, “Can’t wait to see the direction of this new blog, Kate!  I’m honored to be included on your blogroll.”

* The illustration is taken from The Court of Chancery, by Augustus Charles Pugin & Thomas Rowlandson for Ackermann’s Microcosm of London (1808-11). The full illustration can be seen on law.arts.culture.

Posted in Copyright, events, Literary Works

One Response to “New Blog, law.arts.culture, Debuted by Osgoode Professor, Kate Sutherland”

  1. Tweets that mention IP Osgoode » New Blog, law.arts.culture, Debuted by Osgoode Professor, Kate Sutherland -- Topsy.com, on February 24, 2011 at 2:59 pm Said:

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by faceyet and Kate Sutherland, Kate Sutherland. Kate Sutherland said: A very generous post at IP Osgoode about my new blogging endeavour: http://ow.ly/42PHo. [...]

Leave a Reply

All replies and responses are moderated and will not appear on the site immediately. Please see our response policy.

« Canadian IP Community comes together for another Successful Harold G. Fox IP Moot | US Patent Reform Act of 2011 to Enact “First-to-File” System »

Career Opportunities
Osgoode IP Club
Writing Competitions
IP Research Guide

Follow @IPilogue

RSS Follow Comments via RSS
  • Denise Brunsdon on The Living Daylights (…Scents, Tastes, and Sounds): Bill C-56 Forebodes Drastic Trade-mark Reform
  • Denise Brunsdon on Must Every Canadian Patent Application Include the Inventor’s Best Mode of Working the Invention?
  • Matt on Mario Bouchard: Copyright Quintet opus 1. no.1, by McLachlin et al
  • Danny Titolo on The ‘Myriad’ with the Golden ‘Gene’: Australia Upholds Breast Cancer Gene Patents
  • Tracy Ayodele on Exceptions which Circumvent Logic
  • Nancy Situ on Military Tactics and Rock Star Patent Lawyers; the Patent System under Stress
  • Laura on The Rise and Fall [and Rise Again?] of BlackBerry
  • Howard Knopf on How Music Can Help You, And You Can Help Music – An Interview With Graham Henderson
  • Paul Atkinson on Bill C-56 Remedies: Rights Holders Can All Feel a Little Safer
  • Bart Cormier on The Living Daylights (…Scents, Tastes, and Sounds): Bill C-56 Forebodes Drastic Trade-mark Reform
RSS Follow Posts via RSS
  • Law, Culture, Critique
  • EU Moving Toward New Trade-Mark Regime
  • A Cautionary Kudos: Canada Moves Up on USTR IP Watch List
  • New Step for the Modernization of Copyright Law in the US – Progress or Regress?
  • Reminder: Canada’s IP Writing Challenge 2013
  • Property in Brands
  • Strike Three, Viacom
  • New Book – The Copyright Pentalogy: How the Supreme Court of Canada Shook the Foundations of Canadian Copyright Law
  • The Curious Case of Fake Beijing Olympics Merchandise
  • About the Boundaries of Fairness in Fair Use
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • Advisory Board (9)
  • Announcements (31)
  • Blogs (24)
  • Book Review (5)
  • Broadcasting Regulatory Policy (8)
  • Cloud Services (11)
  • Commercialization (90)
  • Competition (19)
  • Competition Law (14)
  • Contracts (69)
  • copyright reform (159)
  • defamation (19)
  • Design (16)
  • Development (6)
  • European Union (56)
  • events (89)
  • Fashion Industry (23)
  • Feature Post (207)
  • Freedom of Speech (22)
  • Freedom of the Press (17)
  • Gaming (9)
  • General (151)
  • Human Rights (10)
  • Image (6)
  • Innovation (156)
  • Internet (274)
  • IP (1245)
    • Copyright (619)
      • CD Levy (10)
      • Digital Downloads (78)
      • Digital Libraries (7)
      • Digital Locks (34)
      • Fair Dealing (80)
        • Parody (2)
        • Satire (1)
      • Infringement (158)
      • Internet Sharing (96)
      • Literary Works (65)
      • Moral Rights (16)
      • Movies (53)
      • Music Industry (105)
      • Originality (34)
      • Ownership (107)
        • Licensees (39)
      • Secondary (ISP) Liability (18)
      • Subsidiary Rights (5)
    • IP Reform (38)
    • Patents (382)
      • Access to Medicines (21)
      • Cross Border Issues (50)
      • Electronic Processes (20)
      • Infringement (72)
      • Patent Practice (27)
      • Patent Trolls (21)
      • Patentability (109)
      • Pharmaceutical Drugs (76)
    • Trademarks (245)
      • Domain Names (44)
      • Famous Marks (20)
      • Official Marks (11)
      • Parallel Importation (4)
      • Personality Rights (12)
  • IP Course Topic (13)
  • IP Intensive (26)
  • IP Litigation Practice (17)
  • Jurisdiction (179)
    • Canada (82)
    • Indonesia (1)
    • Japan (2)
    • UK (41)
    • US (75)
  • Law & Music Course Topic (21)
  • Links (3)
  • MediaLaws (17)
  • Music Industry (86)
  • Open-Source (18)
  • Osgoode Alumnus (14)
  • Patents Course Topic (28)
  • Privacy (188)
    • Electronic Databases (42)
    • Human Rights Issues (31)
    • Identity Theft (14)
  • Regulatory Policy (65)
  • Reputation Management (4)
  • Smartphones (14)
  • Social Justice (4)
    • United Nations Development Programme (2)
  • Social Media (30)
  • Supreme Court of Canada (35)
  • Tech Transfer (31)
  • Technology (245)
  • Telecommunications (89)
  • Trade Secrets (9)
  • UK (19)
  • Uncategorized (102)
  • US-Canada Relations (5)
  • WIPO (18)
  • Log in

Home   |   Contact Us   |   Feedback  |   Privacy   

© 2008 Osgoode Hall Law School York University
4700 Keele Street Toronto, Canada M3J 1P3
T:416.736.5030   F:416.736.5736