• Welcome
    Sponsors
  • Director
    Members
    Advisory Board
    International Advisory Council
    Research Affiliates
    IPilogue Editors
    Alumni
  • IPilogue
    Events
    Publications
  • JD
    Graduate Program
    Clinical
    Prizes & Awards
  • The IPIGRAM Archive
    Events Archive
    IP in the News
    IP Poll of the Week
    IP Pick of the Week
    Gowlings IPilogue Prize
  • Legislation
    Journals
    Government
  • Contact Us
    Subscribe

Canadian IP Community comes together for another Successful Harold G. Fox IP Moot

February 22, 2011 by Sangeetha Punniyamoorthy and Thomas Kurys

Fox photo P1000286 v2 copy

Sangeetha Punniyamoorthy and Thomas Kurys are lawyers at Dimock Stratton LLP, and both are Osgoode alumni.

The 3rd annual Harold G. Fox Moot took place this past weekend (February 18-19, 2011) at the Federal Court in downtown Toronto. This year’s moot problem dealt with the common law tort of passing off and the issue of functionality in relation to the design of competing chef’s knives.

Teams from eight law schools across Canada competed for the Harold G. Fox Cup: Queen’s University, Osgoode Hall, University of Alberta, University of Ottawa, University of Toronto, University of Victoria, the University of Western Ontario and the University of Windsor. The moot kicked-off with the second annual Fox IP Lecture, which was delivered this year by the Right Honourable Lord Justice Robin Jacob of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales. Lord Justice Jacob discussed “The Common Law of IP” and pondered whether it was time to bury the American Cyanamid test for an interlocutory injunction. The Fox Lecture will be published in the Intellectual Property Journal edited by Professors David Vaver and Giuseppina D’Agostino.

The first of two rounds of preliminary competition was underway shortly after Lord Justice Jacob’s lecture. Once again the Moot featured a wide range of panellists from both the judiciary and the intellectual property bar. After getting their feet wet in the first preliminary round, the competitors enjoyed a reception with members of the judiciary, academia, and the IP Bar. The second round of preliminaries began bright and early on Saturday morning, and the semi-finalists were announced shortly after lunch. The semi finals on Saturday afternoon featured teams from Osgoode Hall, Queens University, the University of Ottawa and the University of Toronto. In the end, the two Toronto schools moved on to the finals. The final panel this year was made up of Lord Justice Jacob, Justice J. Edgar Sexton of the Federal Court of Appeal, Justice Kathryn N. Feldman of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Justice Jacques A. Léger of the Quebec Court of Appeal and Justice Roger T. Hughes of the Federal Court.

The winners were announced at the awards dinner on Saturday night at the University Club where Lord Justice Jacob presented Devin Doyle and Kim Lawton of Osgoode Hall with the Harold G. Fox Cup, as the best moot team. The Gordon F. Henderson Award for the Best Factum was awarded to Susanne Coles and Edwin Mok of the University of Ottawa and Kayla Kwinter of Queen’s University was awarded the Don F. Sim Award for Best Oralist. Vanessa Park-Thompson of the University of Toronto was the recipient of the inaugural Dimock Stratton LLP Award, which was given to the best mooter in a non-graduating year. The winner of this Award, along with a team-mate, is invited to represent their law school in the 2012 Oxford International IP Moot in Oxford, England. The winner and team-mate’s accommodation and transportation is arranged and paid for by Dimock Stratton LLP.

This year’s Fox Moot was a success due to all the participants, panellists and sponsors, and the organizers look forward to another successful Moot next year.

Posted in events, Feature Post, Osgoode Alumnus

One Response to “Canadian IP Community comes together for another Successful Harold G. Fox IP Moot”

  1. Tweets that mention IP Osgoode » Canadian IP Community comes together for another Successful Harold G. Fox IP Moot -- Topsy.com, on February 22, 2011 at 5:02 pm Said:

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by PRO Legal, PRO Law. PRO Law said: IP Osgoode » Canadian IP Community comes together for another …: Once again the Moot featured a wide range of … http://bit.ly/gYDOfU [...]

Leave a Reply

All replies and responses are moderated and will not appear on the site immediately. Please see our response policy.

« “Business Method Patents: the State of the Art after the Amazon.com Decision” | New Blog, law.arts.culture, Debuted by Osgoode Professor, Kate Sutherland »

Career Opportunities
Osgoode IP Club
Writing Competitions
IP Research Guide

Follow @IPilogue

RSS Follow Comments via RSS
  • Denise Brunsdon on The Living Daylights (…Scents, Tastes, and Sounds): Bill C-56 Forebodes Drastic Trade-mark Reform
  • Denise Brunsdon on Must Every Canadian Patent Application Include the Inventor’s Best Mode of Working the Invention?
  • Matt on Mario Bouchard: Copyright Quintet opus 1. no.1, by McLachlin et al
  • Danny Titolo on The ‘Myriad’ with the Golden ‘Gene’: Australia Upholds Breast Cancer Gene Patents
  • Tracy Ayodele on Exceptions which Circumvent Logic
  • Nancy Situ on Military Tactics and Rock Star Patent Lawyers; the Patent System under Stress
  • Laura on The Rise and Fall [and Rise Again?] of BlackBerry
  • Howard Knopf on How Music Can Help You, And You Can Help Music – An Interview With Graham Henderson
  • Paul Atkinson on Bill C-56 Remedies: Rights Holders Can All Feel a Little Safer
  • Bart Cormier on The Living Daylights (…Scents, Tastes, and Sounds): Bill C-56 Forebodes Drastic Trade-mark Reform
RSS Follow Posts via RSS
  • Law, Culture, Critique
  • EU Moving Toward New Trade-Mark Regime
  • A Cautionary Kudos: Canada Moves Up on USTR IP Watch List
  • New Step for the Modernization of Copyright Law in the US – Progress or Regress?
  • Reminder: Canada’s IP Writing Challenge 2013
  • Property in Brands
  • Strike Three, Viacom
  • New Book – The Copyright Pentalogy: How the Supreme Court of Canada Shook the Foundations of Canadian Copyright Law
  • The Curious Case of Fake Beijing Olympics Merchandise
  • About the Boundaries of Fairness in Fair Use
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • Advisory Board (9)
  • Announcements (31)
  • Blogs (24)
  • Book Review (5)
  • Broadcasting Regulatory Policy (8)
  • Cloud Services (11)
  • Commercialization (90)
  • Competition (19)
  • Competition Law (14)
  • Contracts (69)
  • copyright reform (159)
  • defamation (19)
  • Design (16)
  • Development (6)
  • European Union (56)
  • events (89)
  • Fashion Industry (23)
  • Feature Post (207)
  • Freedom of Speech (22)
  • Freedom of the Press (17)
  • Gaming (9)
  • General (151)
  • Human Rights (10)
  • Image (6)
  • Innovation (156)
  • Internet (274)
  • IP (1245)
    • Copyright (619)
      • CD Levy (10)
      • Digital Downloads (78)
      • Digital Libraries (7)
      • Digital Locks (34)
      • Fair Dealing (80)
        • Parody (2)
        • Satire (1)
      • Infringement (158)
      • Internet Sharing (96)
      • Literary Works (65)
      • Moral Rights (16)
      • Movies (53)
      • Music Industry (105)
      • Originality (34)
      • Ownership (107)
        • Licensees (39)
      • Secondary (ISP) Liability (18)
      • Subsidiary Rights (5)
    • IP Reform (38)
    • Patents (382)
      • Access to Medicines (21)
      • Cross Border Issues (50)
      • Electronic Processes (20)
      • Infringement (72)
      • Patent Practice (27)
      • Patent Trolls (21)
      • Patentability (109)
      • Pharmaceutical Drugs (76)
    • Trademarks (245)
      • Domain Names (44)
      • Famous Marks (20)
      • Official Marks (11)
      • Parallel Importation (4)
      • Personality Rights (12)
  • IP Course Topic (13)
  • IP Intensive (26)
  • IP Litigation Practice (17)
  • Jurisdiction (179)
    • Canada (82)
    • Indonesia (1)
    • Japan (2)
    • UK (41)
    • US (75)
  • Law & Music Course Topic (21)
  • Links (3)
  • MediaLaws (17)
  • Music Industry (86)
  • Open-Source (18)
  • Osgoode Alumnus (14)
  • Patents Course Topic (28)
  • Privacy (188)
    • Electronic Databases (42)
    • Human Rights Issues (31)
    • Identity Theft (14)
  • Regulatory Policy (65)
  • Reputation Management (4)
  • Smartphones (14)
  • Social Justice (4)
    • United Nations Development Programme (2)
  • Social Media (30)
  • Supreme Court of Canada (35)
  • Tech Transfer (31)
  • Technology (245)
  • Telecommunications (89)
  • Trade Secrets (9)
  • UK (19)
  • Uncategorized (102)
  • US-Canada Relations (5)
  • WIPO (18)
  • Log in

Home   |   Contact Us   |   Feedback  |   Privacy   

© 2008 Osgoode Hall Law School York University
4700 Keele Street Toronto, Canada M3J 1P3
T:416.736.5030   F:416.736.5736