Home » 2010 » June

A Question of Intent: Expired Patents and False Markings

A Question of Intent: Expired Patents and False Markings

Amanda Carpenter is a JD Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has recently decided the case of Pequignot v. Solo Cup Co. between Matthew Pequignot, a licensed patent attorney, and the Solo Cup Company (“Solo”), a company that manufactures disposable cups, bowls, plates, and utensils. […]

High Technology Entrepreneurs and the Patent System

High Technology Entrepreneurs and the Patent System

Pamela Samuelson is the Richard M. Sherman ‘74 Distinguished Professor of Law and Information at the University of California at Berkeley. Researchers affiliated with the Berkeley Center for Law & Technology--Rob Merges and Pam Samuelson of Berkeley Law School, Ted Sichelman of University of San Diego Law School, and Stu Graham of the Georgia Institute […]

Revisiting the Utility Requirement

Revisiting the Utility Requirement

Stuart Freen is a JD candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School. It is no secret that there have been plenty of absurd patents issued over the years. The gerbil shirt, anyone? Of the three main requirements for patentability, utility definitely tends to have the lowest bar (novelty and non-obviousness being the others). Particularly in Canada, […]

Winners of Gowlings Best Blog in IP Law and Technology Prize

Winners of Gowlings Best Blog in IP Law and Technology Prize

IP Osgoode would like to congratulate the winners of the Gowlings Best Blog in IP Law and Technology Prize for 2009-2010.  Four prizes in total are awarded each year to Osgoode students.  In each academic semester there is one prize for the best posting and one prize for the best comment/response. The prizes were pioneered […]

Online Keyword Advertising: Misleading Customers? Or Providing Alternatives?

Online Keyword Advertising: Misleading Customers? Or Providing Alternatives?

Robert Dewald is a JD Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School Online advertising is a growing and lucrative business.  In 2009, $22.7 billion USD was spent on online advertising within the U.S. which is projected to grow to $25.1 billion USD by 2010.  A significant amount of this revenue is generated by Google, Yahoo and […]

Bill C-32: A Sampling of Commentary on Technological Protection Measures

Bill C-32: A Sampling of Commentary on Technological Protection Measures

Professor Giuseppina D’Agostino is the Founder and Director of IP Osgoode. As the commentary on Bill C-32 continues to take shape, the one issue that is getting the most attention (and certainly not unlike the other legislative attempts in Bill C-60 and Bill C-61) is again the issue of technological protection measures or what is […]

The Google Books Ripple Effect

The Google Books Ripple Effect

Michael John Long is an LLM candidate advancing to the PhD at Osgoode Hall Law School The leviathan known as the Google Books project may have far reaching consequences for international copyright law, as well as, the potential violation of antitrust law and the terms of international treaties, as a recent Globe and Mail article […]

Bill C-32: Clarifying the Roles and Responsibilities of Internet Service Providers and Search Engines

Bill C-32: Clarifying the Roles and Responsibilities of Internet Service Providers and Search Engines

Amanda Carpenter is a JD Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School. On June 2, 2010 the Federal Government of Canada introduced the Copyright Modernization Act (or Bill C-32) that proposes to amend the Copyright Act to better address the “challenges and opportunities presented by the digital age”. The Bill comes about two years after its […]