• Welcome
    Sponsors
  • Director
    Assistant Director
    Members
    Advisory Board
    International Advisory Council
    Research Affiliates
    IPilogue Editors
  • IPilogue
    Projects
    Publications
  • JD
    Graduate Program
    Clinical
    Prizes & Awards
  • The IPIGRAM Archive
    Events Archive
    IP in the News
    IP Poll of the Week
    IP Pick of the Week
    Gowlings IPilogue Prize
  • Legislation
    Journals
    Government
  • Contact Us
    Subscribe

Team Conan Leaving Jokes Behind

February 6, 2010 by Stuart Freen (IPilogue Editor)

Stu Freen is a JD candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School.

As details of Conan O’Brien’s severance deal with NBC leak out, it seems that at least one thing won’t be travelling with Conan to wherever he ends up: His signature characters and comedy bits. NBC has reportedly staked out the IP rights in classic Late Night recurring characters such as Conando, the Masturbating Bear, and Clutch Cargo Arnold as part of Conan’s $40 million deal to leave the Tonight Show.

While lawyers from both sides have been hush on the issue, sources close to the negotiations told the Hollywood Reporter that NBC will retain the rights to all the characters and gags created for Late Night and the Tonight Show. The future of perhaps the most popular Late Night character, Triumph the Insult Comic Dog, is a little less certain since he was actually created prior to his first appearance on the Late Show by writer and comedian Robert Smigel. My personal favourite bit, the Walker Texas Ranger Lever, sadly will almost certainly be gone for good since it was premised entirely on the fact that NBC had access to royalty-free Walker clips.

This aspect of the Conan deal has struck entertainment lawyers as unusual since front-end contracts for comedy shows usually assign IP rights to creators. Although by default copyright goes to employers, TV deals are almost entirely contractual and as such the assignment of IP is governed by the terms. For instance, Law.com points out that David Letterman now owns all of his skits and characters and therefore wouldn’t face this issue if he were to ever leave CBS. However, Letterman too had to change the name of some of his bits when he made a similar move from NBC to CBS in 1993, indicating that he might not have always wielded such bargaining power with network executives.

While it is extremely unlikely that NBC will actually try to use any of Conan’s characters without him, the move is seen as a ploy to keep Conan’s next show from catching on. NBC hopes that without his familiar gags Conan will have a hard time attracting some of his old fans. However, Letterman’s past experience indicates that Conan will probably just be able to tweak the names and content of his skits a little bit in order to recycle them.

Hollywood document-trolling website the Smoking Gun also reported (perhaps prematurely) that the theme music to various Late Night and Tonight Show segments may be safe since the copyright was registered by band members Max Weinberg and Jimmy Vivino. However, mere registration of a copyright does not necessarily imply ownership and as such should be taken with a large grain of salt.

On a related note, the NBC-Conan deal purportedly includes a blackout period where Conan cannot appear on TV during returning host Jay Leno’s first shows back at the Tonight Show. Perhaps wisely, NBC wanted to avoid a late night mud-slinging war like what was going on throughout Conan’s last week on the air. Under the deal Conan will not be able to appear on rival talk shows like the Late Show or the Daily Show with John Stewart to trash Leno and NBC.

Posted in Contracts, Copyright, IP, Ownership

Leave a Reply

All replies and responses are moderated and will not appear on the site immediately. Please see our response policy.

« Maize as Cultural Heritage | Who quizzes WHO’s role in solving the Influenza pandemic crisis: An Insight »

Career Opportunities
Osgoode IP Club
Events Calendar
Writing Competitions
IP Research Guide

 

RSS Follow Comments via RSS
  • bob on Bill C-32: Copyright and Education in the Digital Age
  • Stuart Freen on Sizing Privacy Harm
  • Steven Bercu on First sale and digital content
  • Anonymous on Federal Court of Appeal rules that ISPs are not "broadcasters"
  • Stuart Freen on Federal Court of Appeal rules that ISPs are not "broadcasters"
  • Anonymous on Federal Court of Appeal rules that ISPs are not "broadcasters"
  • Christian Rock on ‘Operation In Our Sites’
  • Anonymous on Does Fashion Need Copyright Protection?
  • Fly Intheointment on ‘Operation In Our Sites’
  • Bart on Copyright Termination: How Authors can Reclaim their Copyrights
RSS Follow Posts via RSS
  • CRTC Seizes Internet Regulation Mantle
  • Brand Expectations in the Restroom: 4th Circuit Applies Contributory Trademark Infringement Doctrine to Post-Purchase Confusion Case
  • Yes, Patents Do Have Gender
  • Fashion IP Revisited: The Innovative Design Protection and Piracy Prevention Act
  • RIM’s Battle for Information Privacy, Market Share, and its Reputation
  • Transnational Regulation: Rough Consensus and Running Code
  • IP Osgoode: Call for Editors (2010-2011)
  • Sizing Privacy Harm
  • The Internet Age: The Culprit for a Rise in Plagiarism?
  • USPTO Issues Post-Bilski Guidelines for Patent Examiners
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • June 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • Commercialization (46)
  • Contracts (36)
  • copyright reform (65)
  • defamation (6)
  • events (36)
  • General (120)
  • Innovation (79)
  • Internet (122)
  • IP (650)
    • Copyright (308)
      • CD Levy (6)
      • Digital Downloads (39)
      • Digital Locks (12)
      • Fair Dealing (25)
      • Infringement (60)
      • Internet Sharing (50)
      • Literary Works (24)
      • Movies (24)
      • Music Industry (42)
      • Originality (17)
      • Ownership (45)
        • Licensees (12)
      • Subsidiary Rights (4)
    • Patents (198)
      • Cross Border Issues (34)
      • Electronic Processes (7)
      • Infringement (37)
      • Patent Trolls (10)
      • Patentability (59)
      • Pharmaceutical Drugs (46)
    • Trademarks (130)
      • Domain Names (26)
      • Famous Marks (9)
      • Official Marks (8)
      • Parallel Importation (3)
      • Personality Rights (8)
  • IP Course Topic (11)
  • Links (3)
  • Music Industry (39)
  • Open-Source (14)
  • Osgoode Alumnus (3)
  • Privacy (111)
    • Electronic Databases (23)
    • Human Rights Issues (19)
    • Identity Theft (6)
  • Regulatory Policy (2)
  • Tech Transfer (12)
  • Technology (119)
  • Telecommunications (30)
  • Uncategorized (70)
  • Log in

Home   |   Contact Us  

© 2008 Osgoode Hall Law School York University
4700 Keele Street Toronto, Canada M3J 1P3
T:416.736.5030   F:416.736.5736