• Welcome
    Sponsors
  • Director
    Members
    Advisory Board
    International Advisory Council
    Research Affiliates
    IPilogue Editors
  • IPilogue
    Events
    Publications
  • JD
    Graduate Program
    Clinical
    Prizes & Awards
  • The IPIGRAM Archive
    Events Archive
    IP in the News
    IP Poll of the Week
    IP Pick of the Week
    Gowlings IPilogue Prize
  • Legislation
    Journals
    Government
  • Contact Us
    Subscribe

Top Intellectual Property and Technology Stories of 2009

January 5, 2010 by IP Osgoode

2009 was a significant year for developments in the area of intellectual property and technology.  We have put together a brief list of noteworthy news, events and cases that we have covered this past year.  Many of these items received top mainstream news coverage and were closely watched by the Canadian public.  We are also pleased to share with you a list of the top ten most read IPilogue articles from last year.  2010 should prove to be another fascinating year!

Top Stories of 2009:

Copyright garnered a lot of attention in Canada and internationally, including Canada’s cross-country public copyright consultations this past summer, the Google Books settlement, legal battles over Star Wars stormtrooper helmets and student paper plagiarism detection systems.  Amazon’s Kindle e-reader raised some new examples of unique copyright challenges associated with new technology and the Robertson v. Thomson class action was settled after 13 years of litigation in Canada.  A series of P2P and file sharing sites took centre stage, with new developments in legal cases involving the Pirate Bay in Sweden, Mininova in the Netherlands, and IsoHunt in Canada.

Patent law also grabbed headlines as the US Supreme Court heard the In Re Bilski business method patent case last November.  Amazon’s patent application for its one-click ordering system was rejected by the Canadian Patent Appeal Board and Toronto-based i4i Inc. won a major patent dispute over Microsoft.  Patents even became a point of discussion following the news of Michael Jackson’s death.  A complaint against Myriad Genetics and its gene patents was filed in 2009 and will be an interesting case to follow this year.

Trade-marks will continue to be a focal point of discussion in Canada, particularly with respect to Olympic marks (as the Winter Olympics commence in Vancouver very soon).  Internationally, the EU Advocate General released an opinion that Google’s AdWords do not violate trademarks and ICANN moved to introduce new generic and internationalized top level domains.  A long running disagreement over the use of the prefix “glen” in Canadian single malt whisky and a recent South African case dealing with the use of “Century City” highlighted difficulties that arise when dealing with words that arguably designate geographical origins.    

Facebook’s evolving approaches to privacy and the CRTC’s decision on ISP traffic management practices were also top mainstream news items and closely watched by the Canadian public in 2009.

 

Top 10 Most Read IPilogue Articles of 2009:

  1. The truth about Wikipedia’s flagged revisions
  2. Termination of Transfer of Copyright and the Estate of Jack Kirby
  3. A short overview on the tort of appropriation of personality
  4. Movie Piracy in Canada
  5. Potential of US Copyright Agenda to Endanger Freedom of Expression in China
  6. Fair Use or Fair Dealing: Which Should Give You More Comfort?
  7. Anti-Counterfeiting: The Success of Louis Vuitton
  8. In re Bilski North of the Border
  9. Bill C-27: An Early Critical Look at the Electronic Commerce Protection Act
  10. The Grey-Market: Are the Benefits Worth the Costs?

 

Three Things to Keep Your Eye on in 2010

  1. The role of Internet Service Providers in handling online copyright infringement (in particular, graduated response initiatives around the world).
  2. The US Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision in the business method patents case, In Re Bilski.
  3. Social networks and cloud computing applications will come under even greater scrutiny with respect to their privacy policies and practices.

Posted in Copyright, General, IP, Patents, Privacy, Trademarks

Leave a Reply

All replies and responses are moderated and will not appear on the site immediately. Please see our response policy.

« Is a Re-Brand of the Canadian Trade-marks Act Imminent? | IsoHunt found liable for inducing copyright infringement »

Career Opportunities
Osgoode IP Club
Writing Competitions
IP Research Guide

RSS Follow Comments via RSS
  • James Wagner on Copyright at the Edge of Artistic Creativity
  • Ken Anderson on Bill C-11: Through the Lens of Social Norms
  • Courtney Doagoo on Evidence Of Parasitic Intent Not Unfounded: L’Oreal
  • Denis Borges Barbosa on Evidence Of Parasitic Intent Not Unfounded: L’Oreal
  • D Vaver on Disclosure Front and Centre as Pfizer Prepares to Defend Viagra in Supreme Court of Canada
  • Dr. Emir Crowne on Disclosure Front and Centre as Pfizer Prepares to Defend Viagra in Supreme Court of Canada
  • Adam Stevenson on Bill C-11: Through the Lens of Social Norms
  • Anonymous on Should Canada Strengthen IP Protection for Pharmaceutical Products? The European Union Thinks So...
  • Aidan Hollis on Should Canada Strengthen IP Protection for Pharmaceutical Products? The European Union Thinks So...
  • Kalen Lumsden on IP Osgoode Speaker Series: Robert Levine and Dr. Brett Danaher
RSS Follow Posts via RSS
  • One Step Closer: Bill C-11
  • Bergeron Entrepreneurs in Science and Technology (BEST) Program Launches at York
  • Whose Patent is It Anyway?: The Ongoing Legal Legacy Between Samsung and Apple
  • Copyright at the Edge of Artistic Creativity
  • Luksan v. Van der Let, Or Rather, EU v. UrhG?
  • Global Health Challenges and the Role of Law
  • Sampling Questions Still Unsettled After Jay-Z/Kanye West Sampling Settlement
  • World Intellectual Property Day 2012
  • The Legal Implications of Commercializing Intellectual Property Rights
  • Announcement: Global Health Challenges and the Role of Law: the 2012 National Health Law Conference

IP Osgoode would like to send out its IPIGRAM at a time when most convenient for you. Please let us know your views by answering a few questions so that we can better serve you.

Click here to take poll.
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • June 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • Advisory Board (4)
  • Announcements (2)
  • Blogs (4)
  • Book Review (3)
  • Broadcasting Regulatory Policy (5)
  • Cloud Services (3)
  • Commercialization (77)
  • Competition (6)
  • Competition Law (7)
  • Contracts (59)
  • copyright reform (136)
  • defamation (15)
  • Design (6)
  • Development (4)
  • European Union (32)
  • events (75)
  • Fashion Industry (13)
  • Feature Post (126)
  • Freedom of Speech (15)
  • Freedom of the Press (14)
  • Gaming (6)
  • General (145)
  • Human Rights (3)
  • Image (2)
  • Innovation (138)
  • Internet (236)
  • IP (1041)
    • Copyright (522)
      • CD Levy (9)
      • Digital Downloads (64)
      • Digital Libraries (1)
      • Digital Locks (28)
      • Fair Dealing (61)
        • Parody (2)
        • Satire (1)
      • Infringement (124)
      • Internet Sharing (92)
      • Literary Works (52)
      • Moral Rights (9)
      • Movies (47)
      • Music Industry (88)
      • Originality (29)
      • Ownership (81)
        • Licensees (31)
      • Secondary (ISP) Liability (14)
      • Subsidiary Rights (5)
    • IP Reform (19)
    • Patents (331)
      • Access to Medicines (12)
      • Cross Border Issues (48)
      • Electronic Processes (18)
      • Infringement (60)
      • Patent Practice (18)
      • Patent Trolls (20)
      • Patentability (97)
      • Pharmaceutical Drugs (65)
    • Trademarks (201)
      • Domain Names (38)
      • Famous Marks (15)
      • Official Marks (10)
      • Parallel Importation (4)
      • Personality Rights (11)
  • IP Course Topic (11)
  • IP Intensive (4)
  • IP Litigation Practice (15)
  • Jurisdiction (65)
    • Canada (24)
    • Indonesia (1)
    • Japan (1)
    • UK (25)
    • US (28)
  • Law & Music Course Topic (20)
  • Links (3)
  • MediaLaws (6)
  • Music Industry (72)
  • Open-Source (16)
  • Osgoode Alumnus (10)
  • Patents Course Topic (28)
  • Privacy (165)
    • Electronic Databases (36)
    • Human Rights Issues (26)
    • Identity Theft (11)
  • Regulatory Policy (46)
  • Reputation Management (2)
  • Smartphones (10)
  • Social Justice (2)
    • United Nations Development Programme (1)
  • Social Media (23)
  • Supreme Court of Canada (17)
  • Tech Transfer (29)
  • Technology (208)
  • Telecommunications (73)
  • Trade Secrets (3)
  • UK (10)
  • Uncategorized (82)
  • US-Canada Relations (2)
  • WIPO (9)
  • Log in

Home   |   Contact Us  

© 2008 Osgoode Hall Law School York University
4700 Keele Street Toronto, Canada M3J 1P3
T:416.736.5030   F:416.736.5736