• Welcome
    Sponsors
  • Director
    Assistant Director
    Members
    Advisory Board
    International Advisory Council
    Research Affiliates
    IPilogue Editors
  • IPilogue
    Projects
    Publications
  • JD
    Graduate Program
    Clinical
    Prizes & Awards
  • The IPIGRAM Archive
    Events Archive
    IP in the News
    IP Poll of the Week
    IP Pick of the Week
    Gowlings IPilogue Prize
  • Legislation
    Journals
    Government
  • Contact Us
    Subscribe

Top Intellectual Property and Technology Stories of 2009

January 5, 2010 by IP Osgoode

2009 was a significant year for developments in the area of intellectual property and technology.  We have put together a brief list of noteworthy news, events and cases that we have covered this past year.  Many of these items received top mainstream news coverage and were closely watched by the Canadian public.  We are also pleased to share with you a list of the top ten most read IPilogue articles from last year.  2010 should prove to be another fascinating year!

Top Stories of 2009:

Copyright garnered a lot of attention in Canada and internationally, including Canada’s cross-country public copyright consultations this past summer, the Google Books settlement, legal battles over Star Wars stormtrooper helmets and student paper plagiarism detection systems.  Amazon’s Kindle e-reader raised some new examples of unique copyright challenges associated with new technology and the Robertson v. Thomson class action was settled after 13 years of litigation in Canada.  A series of P2P and file sharing sites took centre stage, with new developments in legal cases involving the Pirate Bay in Sweden, Mininova in the Netherlands, and IsoHunt in Canada.

Patent law also grabbed headlines as the US Supreme Court heard the In Re Bilski business method patent case last November.  Amazon’s patent application for its one-click ordering system was rejected by the Canadian Patent Appeal Board and Toronto-based i4i Inc. won a major patent dispute over Microsoft.  Patents even became a point of discussion following the news of Michael Jackson’s death.  A complaint against Myriad Genetics and its gene patents was filed in 2009 and will be an interesting case to follow this year.

Trade-marks will continue to be a focal point of discussion in Canada, particularly with respect to Olympic marks (as the Winter Olympics commence in Vancouver very soon).  Internationally, the EU Advocate General released an opinion that Google’s AdWords do not violate trademarks and ICANN moved to introduce new generic and internationalized top level domains.  A long running disagreement over the use of the prefix “glen” in Canadian single malt whisky and a recent South African case dealing with the use of “Century City” highlighted difficulties that arise when dealing with words that arguably designate geographical origins.    

Facebook’s evolving approaches to privacy and the CRTC’s decision on ISP traffic management practices were also top mainstream news items and closely watched by the Canadian public in 2009.

 

Top 10 Most Read IPilogue Articles of 2009:

  1. The truth about Wikipedia’s flagged revisions
  2. Termination of Transfer of Copyright and the Estate of Jack Kirby
  3. A short overview on the tort of appropriation of personality
  4. Movie Piracy in Canada
  5. Potential of US Copyright Agenda to Endanger Freedom of Expression in China
  6. Fair Use or Fair Dealing: Which Should Give You More Comfort?
  7. Anti-Counterfeiting: The Success of Louis Vuitton
  8. In re Bilski North of the Border
  9. Bill C-27: An Early Critical Look at the Electronic Commerce Protection Act
  10. The Grey-Market: Are the Benefits Worth the Costs?

 

Three Things to Keep Your Eye on in 2010

  1. The role of Internet Service Providers in handling online copyright infringement (in particular, graduated response initiatives around the world).
  2. The US Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision in the business method patents case, In Re Bilski.
  3. Social networks and cloud computing applications will come under even greater scrutiny with respect to their privacy policies and practices.

Posted in Copyright, General, IP, Patents, Privacy, Trademarks

Leave a Reply

All replies and responses are moderated and will not appear on the site immediately. Please see our response policy.

« Is a Re-Brand of the Canadian Trade-marks Act Imminent? | IsoHunt found liable for inducing copyright infringement »

Career Opportunities
Osgoode IP Club
Events Calendar
Writing Competitions
IP Research Guide

 

RSS Follow Comments via RSS
  • bob on Bill C-32: Copyright and Education in the Digital Age
  • Stuart Freen on Sizing Privacy Harm
  • Steven Bercu on First sale and digital content
  • Anonymous on Federal Court of Appeal rules that ISPs are not "broadcasters"
  • Stuart Freen on Federal Court of Appeal rules that ISPs are not "broadcasters"
  • Anonymous on Federal Court of Appeal rules that ISPs are not "broadcasters"
  • Christian Rock on ‘Operation In Our Sites’
  • Anonymous on Does Fashion Need Copyright Protection?
  • Fly Intheointment on ‘Operation In Our Sites’
  • Bart on Copyright Termination: How Authors can Reclaim their Copyrights
RSS Follow Posts via RSS
  • CRTC Seizes Internet Regulation Mantle
  • Brand Expectations in the Restroom: 4th Circuit Applies Contributory Trademark Infringement Doctrine to Post-Purchase Confusion Case
  • Yes, Patents Do Have Gender
  • Fashion IP Revisited: The Innovative Design Protection and Piracy Prevention Act
  • RIM’s Battle for Information Privacy, Market Share, and its Reputation
  • Transnational Regulation: Rough Consensus and Running Code
  • IP Osgoode: Call for Editors (2010-2011)
  • Sizing Privacy Harm
  • The Internet Age: The Culprit for a Rise in Plagiarism?
  • USPTO Issues Post-Bilski Guidelines for Patent Examiners
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • June 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • Commercialization (46)
  • Contracts (36)
  • copyright reform (65)
  • defamation (6)
  • events (36)
  • General (120)
  • Innovation (79)
  • Internet (122)
  • IP (650)
    • Copyright (308)
      • CD Levy (6)
      • Digital Downloads (39)
      • Digital Locks (12)
      • Fair Dealing (25)
      • Infringement (60)
      • Internet Sharing (50)
      • Literary Works (24)
      • Movies (24)
      • Music Industry (42)
      • Originality (17)
      • Ownership (45)
        • Licensees (12)
      • Subsidiary Rights (4)
    • Patents (198)
      • Cross Border Issues (34)
      • Electronic Processes (7)
      • Infringement (37)
      • Patent Trolls (10)
      • Patentability (59)
      • Pharmaceutical Drugs (46)
    • Trademarks (130)
      • Domain Names (26)
      • Famous Marks (9)
      • Official Marks (8)
      • Parallel Importation (3)
      • Personality Rights (8)
  • IP Course Topic (11)
  • Links (3)
  • Music Industry (39)
  • Open-Source (14)
  • Osgoode Alumnus (3)
  • Privacy (111)
    • Electronic Databases (23)
    • Human Rights Issues (19)
    • Identity Theft (6)
  • Regulatory Policy (2)
  • Tech Transfer (12)
  • Technology (119)
  • Telecommunications (30)
  • Uncategorized (70)
  • Log in

Home   |   Contact Us  

© 2008 Osgoode Hall Law School York University
4700 Keele Street Toronto, Canada M3J 1P3
T:416.736.5030   F:416.736.5736