• Welcome
    Sponsors
  • Director
    Assistant Director
    Members
    Advisory Board
    International Advisory Council
    Research Affiliates
    IPilogue Editors
  • IPilogue
    Projects
    Publications
  • JD
    Graduate Program
    Clinical
    Prizes & Awards
  • The IPIGRAM Archive
    Events Archive
    IP in the News
    IP Poll of the Week
    IP Pick of the Week
    Gowlings IPilogue Prize
  • Legislation
    Journals
    Government
  • Contact Us
    Subscribe

When business meets academia – The commercialization and protection of IP at McMaster’s Stem Cell and Cancer Research Institute

November 24, 2009 by Blake Moran

Blake Moran is a JD candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School.

When you tell someone that you have an undergraduate degree in science, a masters degree in business, and have started studying law, they usually say something like “seems to me like you REALLY can’t make up your mind!”  But this summer, I finally got the opportunity to engage all my interests at once. From May to August I was given the opportunity to challenge myself working for the McMaster Stem Cell and Cancer Research institute.

Some background: The David Braley Human Stem Cell Library is a multi million-dollar endeavor created at McMaster University to leverage academic and commercial applications of stem cell technologies for drug discovery and pharmaceutical development.  Led by Dr. Mick Bhatia the institute has recruited some of the world’s best primary investigators, graduate students, and post-doctoral researchers in respect to various facets of stem cell research to work on the project. 

Admittedly, before this summer, I hadn’t looked at a cell  — let alone a stem cell — since 2004.  It was a major culture shock to be thrown back into the area. “GFP”, “iPS”, “t-hESC”, “EB”… “O.M.G.”, I thought, it’s raining acronyms! 

On my first day on the job, I pretty much had no idea what anyone was talking about, but without hesitation, I was given some recent journal articles to get myself acquainted with the scientific aspects of the institute and I started to get my bearings. Then, after a few hundred pages of Irwin Law’s best IP overview, I had a much better picture of just what an amazing institute I was joining… and I was ready to roll.

The experience was incredibly rewarding – I was able to leverage my existing skills while learning new things all the time. Each day presented new challenges, new learning opportunities, and required a new set of skills to be an effective member of the team.  There was rarely even an opportunity to standardize tasks, because in such a dynamic environment, the tasks I was undertaking were new every day and the position evolved as the internship progressed. 

I started the summer by figuring out what had already been discovered and patented in the field. This kind of knowledge is essential so that a potential IP-owner knows what other rights exist that could possibly prevent them from obtaining their own proprietary rights. I conducted patent (prior art) searches both nationally and internationally in order to evaluate the patent landscape and to proactively prepare for any challenges that may come in gaining IP protection.  I then created a user-friendly database, so the information was consolidated, summarized and accessible to everyone on my team.

The project at McMaster is so important because every year thousands of technologies are created within academic institutions, but many have limited commercial value, and those that do have value are not capable of sustaining an organization on their own.  Traditionally the process taken to commercialize IP technology has been to either obtain industrial partnerships or license/sell the IP rights associated with these technologies to established industrial organizations.  These organizations can use the technology to improve existing products, services or manufacturing practices. However, the Stem Cell and Cancer Research Institute is moving beyond this traditional paradigm – leading the way for new companies and new industries in Ontario, by utilizing in-house business planning to commercialize innovative technologies.

With this in mind, my second task was to lay the business foundation for the institute. I drafted articles of incorporation, by-laws, and IP transfer agreements.  Preparing these documents required both precision and attention to detail. I was also able to provide input in the preparation of negotiations for IP transfers and presentations to academic boards.  Being a relative newcomer meant that I had to be methodical and learn on the go.  I asked a lot of questions and learned through both written sources and friendly lawyers and professors in the industry.

The last phase of my internship involved preparing an application for a multi-million dollar ask from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation. We applied to the Ontario Research Fund – Global Leadership Round in Genomics & Life Sciences (GL2), which has the goal to fund projects that possess both scientific excellence and strategic value for Ontario.  The commercialization aspect of the grant proposal was based on the preliminary work that had been competed throughout my internship.

My experience this summer has meant a whole new level of appreciation for my business associations and intellectual property classes. I understand concepts beyond what has been taught and furthermore I’ve put many of these concepts into practice. It was certainly a privilege to be part of the team at the McMaster Stem Cell and Cancer Research Institute.

Posted in General, Innovation, Tech Transfer

Leave a Reply

All replies and responses are moderated and will not appear on the site immediately. Please see our response policy.

« The Inequitable Commons | The Curious Case of the Actor’s Performance (Part One) »

Career Opportunities
Osgoode IP Club
Events Calendar
Writing Competitions
IP Research Guide

 

RSS Follow Comments via RSS
  • bob on Bill C-32: Copyright and Education in the Digital Age
  • Stuart Freen on Sizing Privacy Harm
  • Steven Bercu on First sale and digital content
  • Anonymous on Federal Court of Appeal rules that ISPs are not "broadcasters"
  • Stuart Freen on Federal Court of Appeal rules that ISPs are not "broadcasters"
  • Anonymous on Federal Court of Appeal rules that ISPs are not "broadcasters"
  • Christian Rock on ‘Operation In Our Sites’
  • Anonymous on Does Fashion Need Copyright Protection?
  • Fly Intheointment on ‘Operation In Our Sites’
  • Bart on Copyright Termination: How Authors can Reclaim their Copyrights
RSS Follow Posts via RSS
  • CRTC Seizes Internet Regulation Mantle
  • Brand Expectations in the Restroom: 4th Circuit Applies Contributory Trademark Infringement Doctrine to Post-Purchase Confusion Case
  • Yes, Patents Do Have Gender
  • Fashion IP Revisited: The Innovative Design Protection and Piracy Prevention Act
  • RIM’s Battle for Information Privacy, Market Share, and its Reputation
  • Transnational Regulation: Rough Consensus and Running Code
  • IP Osgoode: Call for Editors (2010-2011)
  • Sizing Privacy Harm
  • The Internet Age: The Culprit for a Rise in Plagiarism?
  • USPTO Issues Post-Bilski Guidelines for Patent Examiners
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • June 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • Commercialization (46)
  • Contracts (36)
  • copyright reform (65)
  • defamation (6)
  • events (36)
  • General (120)
  • Innovation (79)
  • Internet (122)
  • IP (650)
    • Copyright (308)
      • CD Levy (6)
      • Digital Downloads (39)
      • Digital Locks (12)
      • Fair Dealing (25)
      • Infringement (60)
      • Internet Sharing (50)
      • Literary Works (24)
      • Movies (24)
      • Music Industry (42)
      • Originality (17)
      • Ownership (45)
        • Licensees (12)
      • Subsidiary Rights (4)
    • Patents (198)
      • Cross Border Issues (34)
      • Electronic Processes (7)
      • Infringement (37)
      • Patent Trolls (10)
      • Patentability (59)
      • Pharmaceutical Drugs (46)
    • Trademarks (130)
      • Domain Names (26)
      • Famous Marks (9)
      • Official Marks (8)
      • Parallel Importation (3)
      • Personality Rights (8)
  • IP Course Topic (11)
  • Links (3)
  • Music Industry (39)
  • Open-Source (14)
  • Osgoode Alumnus (3)
  • Privacy (111)
    • Electronic Databases (23)
    • Human Rights Issues (19)
    • Identity Theft (6)
  • Regulatory Policy (2)
  • Tech Transfer (12)
  • Technology (119)
  • Telecommunications (30)
  • Uncategorized (70)
  • Log in

Home   |   Contact Us  

© 2008 Osgoode Hall Law School York University
4700 Keele Street Toronto, Canada M3J 1P3
T:416.736.5030   F:416.736.5736