• Welcome
    Sponsors
  • Director
    Assistant Director
    Members
    Advisory Board
    International Advisory Council
    Research Affiliates
    IPilogue Editors
  • IPilogue
    Projects
    Publications
  • JD
    Graduate Program
    Clinical
    Prizes & Awards
  • The IPIGRAM Archive
    Events Archive
    IP in the News
    IP Poll of the Week
    IP Pick of the Week
    Gowlings IPilogue Prize
  • Legislation
    Journals
    Government
  • Contact Us
    Subscribe

Internet overhauling in European Union

August 3, 2009 by Reshika Dhir (IPilogue Editor)

European Union Telecommunications Commissioner Viviane Reding is planning to overhaul Internet downloading policies in order to facilitate simple, consumer friendly, and legal access to music and films online. Her response to a recent survey, showing 60% of people between ages 16-24 as downloaders of illegal audiovisual content, is that “internet piracy appears to become more and more sexy, in particular for the digital natives.” While this may or may not be true, she has rightly identified that the current business models and legal solutions in place are a “vote of no-confidence” and that there is a need to overhaul internet downloading policies.  

In order to accomplish a user-friendly policy, the EU Commission seeks to undertake the following steps. In addition to making internet downloads easier, it plans on speeding up digitization of books. Furthermore, the Commission also focuses on ‘m-commerce,’ a term that denotes the buying and selling of goods and services through wireless handheld devices such as cellular phones and personal digital assistants (PDAs). According to the Commissioner, the lack of common EU-wide standards and rules for ‘m-cash’ leaves unexploited the great potential of this next generation of e-commerce. The Commission also plans to popularise video-conferencing in order to cut down on the number of business trips, thereby lowering emissions of gases responsible for global warming. Reding indicates that the new laws are supposed to reconcile the interests of IP owners and Internet surfers in order to ensure a fair remuneration for creators and easy access to digital content for consumers.

Although internet piracy is a persistent problem in society, some stats suggest otherwise. A survey of 1,000 fans shows that many 14 to 18 year olds are now streaming music regularly online using services such as YouTube and Spotify. In January, 2009, 26% of 14 to 18 year olds admitted file-sharing at least once a month compared with 42% in December 2007. The research also revealed that many teenagers (65%) are streaming music regularly, with more 14 to 18 year olds (31%) listening to streamed music on their computer every day compared with music fans overall (18%). The picture may be more complex than a simple shift from file-sharing to streaming, with people sharing music in new ways such as via bluetooth technology, on blogs, and through copying, also known as “ripping” content from friends’ MP3 devices. In any event, illegal downloading and file-sharing is still an issue, albeit a smaller one.

While more details of the actual plans are not yet available, there does appear to be a tug of war in place.  A Green Party MEP, in agreement with the German study, says that the best way to go about the business of file-sharing is to legalize it. The study proposes that the best solution is where ISPs issue a flat rate to all subscribers and, in turn, legalize file-sharing. On the other hand, the content industry has been proposing that ISPs should police their networks and disconnect those who engage in persistent copyright infringement. Although the Commissioner’s intention appears to favour the former viewpoint, the ultimate policy changes still remain to be seen. It is hoped that by late 2009, the Commission will systematically evaluate the current policies in light of the existing issues, and will formulate and implement new measures that will not only be effective but also durable.

Posted in Copyright, Infringement, Internet, Internet Sharing

Leave a Reply

All replies and responses are moderated and will not appear on the site immediately. Please see our response policy.

« Open Core Licensing: Arguments and Applications | The Efficacy Standard – India’s New Patentability Criteria »

Career Opportunities
Osgoode IP Club
Events Calendar
Writing Competitions
IP Research Guide

 

RSS Follow Comments via RSS
  • bob on Bill C-32: Copyright and Education in the Digital Age
  • Stuart Freen on Sizing Privacy Harm
  • Steven Bercu on First sale and digital content
  • Anonymous on Federal Court of Appeal rules that ISPs are not "broadcasters"
  • Stuart Freen on Federal Court of Appeal rules that ISPs are not "broadcasters"
  • Anonymous on Federal Court of Appeal rules that ISPs are not "broadcasters"
  • Christian Rock on ‘Operation In Our Sites’
  • Anonymous on Does Fashion Need Copyright Protection?
  • Fly Intheointment on ‘Operation In Our Sites’
  • Bart on Copyright Termination: How Authors can Reclaim their Copyrights
RSS Follow Posts via RSS
  • CRTC Seizes Internet Regulation Mantle
  • Brand Expectations in the Restroom: 4th Circuit Applies Contributory Trademark Infringement Doctrine to Post-Purchase Confusion Case
  • Yes, Patents Do Have Gender
  • Fashion IP Revisited: The Innovative Design Protection and Piracy Prevention Act
  • RIM’s Battle for Information Privacy, Market Share, and its Reputation
  • Transnational Regulation: Rough Consensus and Running Code
  • IP Osgoode: Call for Editors (2010-2011)
  • Sizing Privacy Harm
  • The Internet Age: The Culprit for a Rise in Plagiarism?
  • USPTO Issues Post-Bilski Guidelines for Patent Examiners
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • June 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • Commercialization (46)
  • Contracts (36)
  • copyright reform (65)
  • defamation (6)
  • events (36)
  • General (120)
  • Innovation (79)
  • Internet (122)
  • IP (650)
    • Copyright (308)
      • CD Levy (6)
      • Digital Downloads (39)
      • Digital Locks (12)
      • Fair Dealing (25)
      • Infringement (60)
      • Internet Sharing (50)
      • Literary Works (24)
      • Movies (24)
      • Music Industry (42)
      • Originality (17)
      • Ownership (45)
        • Licensees (12)
      • Subsidiary Rights (4)
    • Patents (198)
      • Cross Border Issues (34)
      • Electronic Processes (7)
      • Infringement (37)
      • Patent Trolls (10)
      • Patentability (59)
      • Pharmaceutical Drugs (46)
    • Trademarks (130)
      • Domain Names (26)
      • Famous Marks (9)
      • Official Marks (8)
      • Parallel Importation (3)
      • Personality Rights (8)
  • IP Course Topic (11)
  • Links (3)
  • Music Industry (39)
  • Open-Source (14)
  • Osgoode Alumnus (3)
  • Privacy (111)
    • Electronic Databases (23)
    • Human Rights Issues (19)
    • Identity Theft (6)
  • Regulatory Policy (2)
  • Tech Transfer (12)
  • Technology (119)
  • Telecommunications (30)
  • Uncategorized (70)
  • Log in

Home   |   Contact Us  

© 2008 Osgoode Hall Law School York University
4700 Keele Street Toronto, Canada M3J 1P3
T:416.736.5030   F:416.736.5736