• Welcome
    Sponsors
  • Director
    Members
    Advisory Board
    International Advisory Council
    Research Affiliates
    IPilogue Editors
  • IPilogue
    Events
    Publications
  • JD
    Graduate Program
    Clinical
    Prizes & Awards
  • The IPIGRAM Archive
    Events Archive
    IP in the News
    IP Poll of the Week
    IP Pick of the Week
    Gowlings IPilogue Prize
  • Legislation
    Journals
    Government
  • Contact Us
    Subscribe

iPhones soon to find their way in China

July 20, 2009 by Reshika Dhir (IPilogue Editor)

Massive uncertainty looms around the future of Apple’s iPhone as Apple hits a new pothole in its rough journey to release iPhones in the Chinese subscriber market. The reason behind this ambiguity is that the trade-mark “i-phone” for mobile handsets in China is already owned by a Chinese electronics firm Hanwang Technologies Co., thereby making it illegal for Apple to sell the iPhones in China. In late 2002, when Apple applied to register the iPhone trade-mark in China, its application only covered computer hardware and software, and not mobile phones.

While very limited news regarding Apple’s attempts to enter the Chinese markets is available, there has surfaced a lot of evidence suggesting that Apple will enter China by the 4th quarter of this year, if not sooner. One of the most compelling pieces of evidence is the article by MacWorld which provides that a Chinese government organization is reporting on its web site that an Apple handset has been approved. This device was reportedly cleared by the State Wireless Inspection Centre in May.

Recent “checks” by Wedge Partners, an independent equity research firm including veterans of Friedman, Billings, Ramsey, also indicates that China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, MIIT, have received “the iPhone application for handset testing.” Consequently, the Wedge analysts believe that the iPhone will soon be receiving a network access license.

Likewise, according to Cynthia Meng, the Bank of America/ Merrill Lynch analyst, the “industry checks” indicate China Unicom, a local carrier, and Apple have “most likely reached a deal for an exclusive 2-plus year agreement” on distribution of the iPhone in China in conjunction with the wireless carrier’s commercial scale 3G service launch in the fourth quarter. In addition, some other sources indicate that Apple has posted a job ad on its website for a Beijing-based role overseeing iPhone training across Asia.

Moreover, a very recent report by JLM Pacific Epoch, an independent research firm focused exclusively on China, reports that a Shenzhen-based unit of Taiwan-based contract electronics manufacturer Foxconn has begun mass production of a customized version of the Apple iPhone 3G to be sold by China Unicom.

Even though there have not been any formal announcements either by Apple or China Unicom, there is a strong likelihood that such news will be released in a few weeks time. Some experts suggest that the major obstacles keeping the iPhones out of China can be traced back to China’s ban on the WiFi function in cellphones, and the Apple’s insistence on running the App Store in China. It is due to the fears over IP-telephony and for the support for WAPI, a domestic rival for WiFi, that the Chinese telecom regulations have banned the use of WiFi functions in mobile phones.

What is ironic about this situation is that the iPhone is already a hot item in China’s gray market as there already are 1 million unlocked and illegally smuggled iPhones in China. However, contrary to the popular expectation of the success of iPhones in China, a senior consultant of Frost & Sullivan, Wang Yuguan, feels that the WiFi-disabled iPhone will significantly reduce its appeal to consumers and will keep off many prospective users. While the future of iPhones in Chinese markets cannot be predicted with surety, it is probably safe to assume that if Apple agrees on terms with China Unicom, iPhone sales will gain a strong foothold in Asia, potentially 138 million subscribers.

Posted in Cross Border Issues, Infringement, Trademarks

Leave a Reply

All replies and responses are moderated and will not appear on the site immediately. Please see our response policy.

« The Principle of Net Neutrality: Arguments and Recent Developments | Michael Jackson: Patented Twinkle Toes »

Career Opportunities
Osgoode IP Club
Writing Competitions
IP Research Guide

RSS Follow Comments via RSS
  • James Wagner on Copyright at the Edge of Artistic Creativity
  • Ken Anderson on Bill C-11: Through the Lens of Social Norms
  • Courtney Doagoo on Evidence Of Parasitic Intent Not Unfounded: L’Oreal
  • Denis Borges Barbosa on Evidence Of Parasitic Intent Not Unfounded: L’Oreal
  • D Vaver on Disclosure Front and Centre as Pfizer Prepares to Defend Viagra in Supreme Court of Canada
  • Dr. Emir Crowne on Disclosure Front and Centre as Pfizer Prepares to Defend Viagra in Supreme Court of Canada
  • Adam Stevenson on Bill C-11: Through the Lens of Social Norms
  • Anonymous on Should Canada Strengthen IP Protection for Pharmaceutical Products? The European Union Thinks So...
  • Aidan Hollis on Should Canada Strengthen IP Protection for Pharmaceutical Products? The European Union Thinks So...
  • Kalen Lumsden on IP Osgoode Speaker Series: Robert Levine and Dr. Brett Danaher
RSS Follow Posts via RSS
  • One Step Closer: Bill C-11
  • Bergeron Entrepreneurs in Science and Technology (BEST) Program Launches at York
  • Whose Patent is It Anyway?: The Ongoing Legal Legacy Between Samsung and Apple
  • Copyright at the Edge of Artistic Creativity
  • Luksan v. Van der Let, Or Rather, EU v. UrhG?
  • Global Health Challenges and the Role of Law
  • Sampling Questions Still Unsettled After Jay-Z/Kanye West Sampling Settlement
  • World Intellectual Property Day 2012
  • The Legal Implications of Commercializing Intellectual Property Rights
  • Announcement: Global Health Challenges and the Role of Law: the 2012 National Health Law Conference

IP Osgoode would like to send out its IPIGRAM at a time when most convenient for you. Please let us know your views by answering a few questions so that we can better serve you.

Click here to take poll.
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • June 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • Advisory Board (4)
  • Announcements (2)
  • Blogs (4)
  • Book Review (3)
  • Broadcasting Regulatory Policy (5)
  • Cloud Services (3)
  • Commercialization (77)
  • Competition (6)
  • Competition Law (7)
  • Contracts (59)
  • copyright reform (136)
  • defamation (15)
  • Design (6)
  • Development (4)
  • European Union (32)
  • events (75)
  • Fashion Industry (13)
  • Feature Post (126)
  • Freedom of Speech (15)
  • Freedom of the Press (14)
  • Gaming (6)
  • General (145)
  • Human Rights (3)
  • Image (2)
  • Innovation (138)
  • Internet (236)
  • IP (1041)
    • Copyright (522)
      • CD Levy (9)
      • Digital Downloads (64)
      • Digital Libraries (1)
      • Digital Locks (28)
      • Fair Dealing (61)
        • Parody (2)
        • Satire (1)
      • Infringement (124)
      • Internet Sharing (92)
      • Literary Works (52)
      • Moral Rights (9)
      • Movies (47)
      • Music Industry (88)
      • Originality (29)
      • Ownership (81)
        • Licensees (31)
      • Secondary (ISP) Liability (14)
      • Subsidiary Rights (5)
    • IP Reform (19)
    • Patents (331)
      • Access to Medicines (12)
      • Cross Border Issues (48)
      • Electronic Processes (18)
      • Infringement (60)
      • Patent Practice (18)
      • Patent Trolls (20)
      • Patentability (97)
      • Pharmaceutical Drugs (65)
    • Trademarks (201)
      • Domain Names (38)
      • Famous Marks (15)
      • Official Marks (10)
      • Parallel Importation (4)
      • Personality Rights (11)
  • IP Course Topic (11)
  • IP Intensive (4)
  • IP Litigation Practice (15)
  • Jurisdiction (65)
    • Canada (24)
    • Indonesia (1)
    • Japan (1)
    • UK (25)
    • US (28)
  • Law & Music Course Topic (20)
  • Links (3)
  • MediaLaws (6)
  • Music Industry (72)
  • Open-Source (16)
  • Osgoode Alumnus (10)
  • Patents Course Topic (28)
  • Privacy (165)
    • Electronic Databases (36)
    • Human Rights Issues (26)
    • Identity Theft (11)
  • Regulatory Policy (46)
  • Reputation Management (2)
  • Smartphones (10)
  • Social Justice (2)
    • United Nations Development Programme (1)
  • Social Media (23)
  • Supreme Court of Canada (17)
  • Tech Transfer (29)
  • Technology (208)
  • Telecommunications (73)
  • Trade Secrets (3)
  • UK (10)
  • Uncategorized (82)
  • US-Canada Relations (2)
  • WIPO (9)
  • Log in

Home   |   Contact Us  

© 2008 Osgoode Hall Law School York University
4700 Keele Street Toronto, Canada M3J 1P3
T:416.736.5030   F:416.736.5736