• Welcome
    Sponsors
  • Director
    Members
    Advisory Board
    International Advisory Council
    Research Affiliates
    IPilogue Editors
    Alumni
  • IPilogue
    Events
    Publications
  • JD
    Graduate Program
    Clinical
    Prizes & Awards
  • The IPIGRAM Archive
    Events Archive
    IP in the News
    IP Poll of the Week
    IP Pick of the Week
    Gowlings IPilogue Prize
  • Legislation
    Journals
    Government
  • Contact Us
    Subscribe

Sleepless in Seattle: A Trademark Lawyer’s Work Isn’t All in the Office

June 8, 2009 by Arnold Ceballos

Arnold Ceballos practices intellectual property law with Pain & Ceballos LLP in Vaughan, Ontario.  He obtained his LLM from Osgoode Hall Law School.

Like many intellectual property lawyers, I am back in my office recovering from the whirlwind that is the annual meeting of the International Trademark Association.  Held in Seattle from May 16 to 20, the meeting draws almost 8000 registered attendees from all over the world, plus a large number of other trademark professionals who do not bother registering, but just take advantage of the opportunity to meet with foreign colleagues and network at various firm receptions.

Many corporate lawyers do not understand intellectual property, let alone why IP lawyers need to attend conferences such as the INTA meeting.  Sure, they can involve travel to some great cities, but it is not as glamorous as it might seem.  Events go from as early as 8 a.m. to late into the night and the pace can be quite frenetic.  In addition to catching up with familiar faces, the conference provides an opportunity to meet people you would normally deal with only by e-mail, phone and fax.  For me, this included meetings with counsel from the United Kingdom, China, El Salvador, Chile, India, the United States, Mexico, and Ireland. 

The meeting is a good opportunity to get up to speed on the latest developments in trademark law, and sessions range from smaller breakfast and lunch “table topic” discussions, to large sessions that attract hundreds of people.  A particular highlight of this year’s conference, at least for many men, was the keynote speech given by supermodel Elle Macpherson, who spoke about her brand.  Sessions I attended ran the gamut from a lunch talk on taxation issues related to intellectual property, to an industry breakout session on parallel trade and gray market goods in the pharmaceutical industry.

Formal sessions and talks are then followed by a myriad of law firm receptions to attend.  Given the global nature of IP practice, these types of events are crucial for establishing new, or cementing existing, relationships with foreign professionals.  Since the conference lasts only four full days, it inevitably happens that there are a number of receptions held at the same time, so you often spend just a brief time at one, before making your way to the next one.  This year, these included parties put on by firms from Germany, South Africa, Japan, and the United States, among other places.  The venues ranged from large nightclubs to law firm offices.  This results in non-stop days that can go from early in the morning to late into the evening.  The pace is so draining that I was in bed shortly after 11 p.m. a couple of times.

As for Seattle, well I saw a lot of Starbucks coffee shops and the Space Needle a couple of times, but not much else.  Coming back to the office almost provides some relief from the pace.  And now I have to start sending my follow-up INTA e-mails to the people I met there…

Posted in General, Trademarks

Leave a Reply

All replies and responses are moderated and will not appear on the site immediately. Please see our response policy.

« Conference Board of Canada Event Highlights Importance of IP Protections | CRTC decides to keep New Media Broadcasting unregulated a little while longer »

Career Opportunities
Osgoode IP Club
Writing Competitions
IP Research Guide

Follow @IPilogue

RSS Follow Comments via RSS
  • Denise Brunsdon on The Living Daylights (…Scents, Tastes, and Sounds): Bill C-56 Forebodes Drastic Trade-mark Reform
  • Denise Brunsdon on Must Every Canadian Patent Application Include the Inventor’s Best Mode of Working the Invention?
  • Matt on Mario Bouchard: Copyright Quintet opus 1. no.1, by McLachlin et al
  • Danny Titolo on The ‘Myriad’ with the Golden ‘Gene’: Australia Upholds Breast Cancer Gene Patents
  • Tracy Ayodele on Exceptions which Circumvent Logic
  • Nancy Situ on Military Tactics and Rock Star Patent Lawyers; the Patent System under Stress
  • Laura on The Rise and Fall [and Rise Again?] of BlackBerry
  • Howard Knopf on How Music Can Help You, And You Can Help Music – An Interview With Graham Henderson
  • Paul Atkinson on Bill C-56 Remedies: Rights Holders Can All Feel a Little Safer
  • Bart Cormier on The Living Daylights (…Scents, Tastes, and Sounds): Bill C-56 Forebodes Drastic Trade-mark Reform
RSS Follow Posts via RSS
  • New Step for the Modernization of Copyright Law in the US – Progress or Regress?
  • Reminder: Canada’s IP Writing Challenge 2013
  • Property in Brands
  • Strike Three, Viacom
  • New Book – The Copyright Pentalogy: How the Supreme Court of Canada Shook the Foundations of Canadian Copyright Law
  • The Curious Case of Fake Beijing Olympics Merchandise
  • About the Boundaries of Fairness in Fair Use
  • Who Inherits Your Likes?
  • Game of Thones – Piracy is Coming
  • AEREO, Cable, What’s The Difference?
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • Advisory Board (9)
  • Announcements (31)
  • Blogs (24)
  • Book Review (5)
  • Broadcasting Regulatory Policy (8)
  • Cloud Services (11)
  • Commercialization (90)
  • Competition (19)
  • Competition Law (14)
  • Contracts (69)
  • copyright reform (158)
  • defamation (19)
  • Design (15)
  • Development (6)
  • European Union (54)
  • events (88)
  • Fashion Industry (22)
  • Feature Post (206)
  • Freedom of Speech (22)
  • Freedom of the Press (17)
  • Gaming (9)
  • General (151)
  • Human Rights (10)
  • Image (6)
  • Innovation (156)
  • Internet (274)
  • IP (1242)
    • Copyright (617)
      • CD Levy (10)
      • Digital Downloads (78)
      • Digital Libraries (7)
      • Digital Locks (34)
      • Fair Dealing (79)
        • Parody (2)
        • Satire (1)
      • Infringement (157)
      • Internet Sharing (96)
      • Literary Works (65)
      • Moral Rights (15)
      • Movies (53)
      • Music Industry (104)
      • Originality (33)
      • Ownership (107)
        • Licensees (39)
      • Secondary (ISP) Liability (18)
      • Subsidiary Rights (5)
    • IP Reform (37)
    • Patents (381)
      • Access to Medicines (21)
      • Cross Border Issues (50)
      • Electronic Processes (20)
      • Infringement (72)
      • Patent Practice (27)
      • Patent Trolls (21)
      • Patentability (109)
      • Pharmaceutical Drugs (75)
    • Trademarks (243)
      • Domain Names (44)
      • Famous Marks (20)
      • Official Marks (11)
      • Parallel Importation (4)
      • Personality Rights (12)
  • IP Course Topic (13)
  • IP Intensive (26)
  • IP Litigation Practice (17)
  • Jurisdiction (176)
    • Canada (80)
    • Indonesia (1)
    • Japan (2)
    • UK (41)
    • US (74)
  • Law & Music Course Topic (21)
  • Links (3)
  • MediaLaws (17)
  • Music Industry (85)
  • Open-Source (18)
  • Osgoode Alumnus (14)
  • Patents Course Topic (28)
  • Privacy (188)
    • Electronic Databases (42)
    • Human Rights Issues (31)
    • Identity Theft (14)
  • Regulatory Policy (64)
  • Reputation Management (4)
  • Smartphones (14)
  • Social Justice (4)
    • United Nations Development Programme (2)
  • Social Media (30)
  • Supreme Court of Canada (34)
  • Tech Transfer (31)
  • Technology (245)
  • Telecommunications (89)
  • Trade Secrets (9)
  • UK (19)
  • Uncategorized (102)
  • US-Canada Relations (4)
  • WIPO (16)
  • Log in

Home   |   Contact Us   |   Feedback  |   Privacy   

© 2008 Osgoode Hall Law School York University
4700 Keele Street Toronto, Canada M3J 1P3
T:416.736.5030   F:416.736.5736